Person:Patience Brooks (2)

Patience Brooks
 
m. 18 Oct 1654
  1. Remembrance Brooks1655 -
  2. William Brooks1655 - 1675
  3. John Brooks1656/57 - 1675
  4. Sarah Brooks1658 - 1732/33
  5. Mary Brooks1659 - Bef 1677
  6. Patience Brooks1661 -
  7. Ebenezer Brooks1662 -
  8. Nathaniel Brooks1664 - Bef 1739/40
  9. Abigail Brooks1665 - 1754
  10. Joseph Brooks1667 - Bef 1743
  11. Mercy Brooks1669 - 1700/01
  12. Benjamin Brooks1671 - 1755
  13. Deliverance Brooks1672/73 -
  14. Thankful Brooks1672/73 - 1673
  15. Jonathan Brooks1674 -
  16. Mary Brooks1677 -
  17. Thankful Brooks1679 -
  • WPatience Brooks1661 -
m. Bef 1680
  1. Daughter Brooks1680 - 1680
Facts and Events
Name[2] Patience Brooks
Gender Female
Birth[1] 5 Jun 1661 Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage Bef 1680 Not married
to Unknown
References
  1. Stott, Clifford L. Vital Records of Springfield, Massachusetts to 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2002)
    Vol. 1, p. 17.

    patience Brooks daughter of william Brooks Borne the 5th of the 4 mon: 1661.
    [Note: In old-styles dates, the fourth month is June. More info may be found here.]
    [Hampshire County Record on Vol. 2, p. 1665.]

  2. NEHGR, "William Brooks of Springfield, Mass., and Some of His Decendants" by Joel Nelson Eno, Vol. 72, p. 142, says Patience "m. soon after 8 Aug 1680 Thomas Taylor of Springfield". Possibly this is simply based on an unjustified assertion in Sheldon, Vol. 2, p. 90. The basis for this oft-repeated statement is not known and no record has yet been located to show which Thomas Taylor this is {several listed in Sheldon but none with wife named Patience, no record of marriage or children born to such a couple), or at what point the marriage occurred ("soon after" birth of a stillborn child "out of wedlock" seems unlikely - what dated record prompted that description?) (Note: there is a deed cited the page on Patience's brother Jonathan Brooks of East Hampton, Suffolk, NY, in 1707, which includes a witness named Thomas Taylor. Thomas Taylor would be a common name, so this could easily be coincidence.)