Person:Esther Fletcher (5)

m. 19 Sep 1677
  1. Sarah Fletcher1679 - 1734
  2. Lydia FletcherAbt 1681 - 1736
  3. Mary FletcherAbt 1684 - 1768
  4. Esther FletcherAbt 1685 - 1767
  5. Josiah Fletcher1687 -
  6. William Fletcher1688 - 1741/42
  7. Capt. Robert Fletcher1690/91 - 1773
  8. Remembrance FletcherAbt 1693 - 1752
  9. Ezekiel Fletcher1694 - 1742
  10. Daniel Fletcher1697 -
  11. Deborah Fletcher1699 -
  12. Phebe Fletcher1700 - 1743
  13. Rebecca Fletcher1702 - 1791
m. 5 Feb 1707
  1. Robert Pierce1707/08 -
  2. Oliver Pierce1709 -
  3. Esther Pierce1711 - 1803
  4. William Pierce1713 -
  5. Stephen Pierce1715 - 1798
  6. Tabitha Pierce1716/17 -
  7. Remembrance Pierce1719 -
  8. Sarah Pierce1720/21 - 1745/46
  9. Mary Pierce1722 -
  10. Benjamin Pierce1726 - 1764
Facts and Events
Name[2] Esther Fletcher
Gender Female
Birth[1] Abt 1685 Chelmsford, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 5 Feb 1707 Chelmsford, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Stephen Pierce
Death[1] 20 Sep 1767 Chelmsford, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Burial[1] 21 Sep 1767 Chelmsford, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Reference Number? Q96199336?
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Chelmsford, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Chelmsford, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1914)
    p. 425.

    PEIRCE, Esther, wid. [Dea. PR4], bur. Sept. 21, 1767, a. 82 y. CR1 [d. Sept. 20. PR4]
    [Birth about 1685. PR4=Diary of Rev. Ebenezer Bridge]

  2. Fletcher, Edward H. (Edward Hatch). Fletcher family history : the descendants of Robert Fletcher of Concord, Mass. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1946)
    p. 30.

    Children of William Fletcher and Sarah Richardson: Esther, m. 5 Jan 1707 Stephen Pierce.

  3.   Without explanation, Source:Snow, Nora Emma. Snow-Estes Ancestry says (Vol. 1, p. 267): Esther, b. Chelmsford, Mass., 1681, d. Chelmsford 1767, ae. 82. Now, the death date comes from VRs, includes the age at death, and calculates to a birth about 1685. No birth is recorded so it remains baffling why a birth in 1681 is asserted. Given a marriage in 1707 [birth 1681=age 26, 1685=age 22], and 10 children born from 1708 [age 27/age 23] to 1726 [age 45/age 41], one would think the later date is more likely.