|
|
__________________________………
Source
- Source:Chalkley's Chronicles
Related
Records
| Surname | Given Name | Volume | Original
Spelling | Original
Count* | Link | Year | Text | Likely WeRelate*** | Comment
| | Hays | George | 1 | George Heas (Hays) | Not | 303 | 1745 | Thomas Nevitt vs. Edmiston and wife.--Petition. George Heas (Hays) made note to plaintiff 12th June, 1745, and died, leaving widow, Sarah, who married James Edmiston. Writ dated 25 th May, 1749. Thomas Nevitt was a Quaker from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. | Person:George Hays (3) | Places date of death after 12 June 1745 and before 25 May 1749
| | Hayes | George | 3 | | 4 | 6 | 1747 | Page 37.--21st May, 1747. Sarah Hays qualifies administratrix of George Hayes, with surety Patrick Hayes. | Person:George Hays (3) | Places DOD before 21 May 1747
| | Hays | George | 1 | | 3 | 28 | 1747 | MAY 21, 1747....(196) Sarah Hays, widow of George, Adm'tes on George's estate. | Person:George Hays (3) |
| | Hayes | George | 3 | | 4 | 7 | 1747 | Page 51.--18th August, 1747. George Hays' appraisement: By Jno. Stevenston, John Paul, Nathl. Evans. | Person:George Hays (3) |
| | Hayes | George | 3 | | 4 | 8 | 1748 | Page 80.--18th May, 1748. Settlement of George Hays' estate by Sarah Hays. administratrix. To Thos. Paxton, Joseph Lynn, Jno. Mahey, Hugh Bolle. | Person:George Hays (3) | Places date of remarriage as after 18 May 1748
| | Hays | George | 1 | | 3 | 41 | 1750 | MAY 24, 1750 (384) James Edmondson and Sarah, his wife, admx. of George Hays, decd. | Person:George Hays (3) | Places remarriage as before 24 May 1750
| | Hayes | George | 3 | | 4 | 41 | 1754 | Page 43.--5th January, 1754. William Burk's will--Sons, John and William, tract purchased of John and Lewis Neal; son, Thomas, tract purchased of George Hay, and entry adjoining called Long Meadow, 400 acres; daughter, Catherine Burk, alias McCommus; daughter, Judea Burk (infant), tract at mouth of Naked Creek. Judea is to be under care of Mrs Matteson. Thomas is to be under care of Mr. John Matteson. Testator's (?) Thomas' (?) interest in estate of David McCommus. Son William to learn trade of blacksmith. Sister Bridget Burk, living out of this Colony. Executors, John Matterson and Gabriel Jones. Teste: Nicholas Null, Thos. Smith, Daniel Remy. Proved, 16th May, 1754, by all witnesses. | Person:George Hays (3) | Refernce to a parcel called Long Meadow, probably refers to "Long Meadow Run" near Timberville. This places George hays in what is now Rockingham County. An inference of this might be that the Patrick Hays mentioned elsewhere in connection with his estate is [[person:Patrick Hays (5)] not Patrick (1)
| | Hays | George | 1 | | 3 | 71 | 1755 | NOVEMBER 25, 1755... (31) Jane Elliott, servant of Thomas Tate. James Hays, orphan of George Hays, decd., of the age of 18 years, chose guardian--William Edmondson. | Person:George Hays (3) | James Hay, son of George Hay and Sarah Dyer
| | Hay | George | 1 | | 1 | 161 | 1770 | AUGUST 27, 1770. (128) George Hay--no inhabitant. | | Possibly Person:George Hays (15) who went to Randolph County
| | Hayes | George | 2 | | 1 | 219 | | ? | |
|
Table Notes
The above records were extracted from Chalkley's Chronicles for persons of a specific given name (e.g "William Hays") ordered by "Year"**. Plausible spelling variants (e.g., "Wm. Hayes", "William Heas", etc) are included. In some cases plausible variants that might be typographical corruptions are included for the sake of erroring on the "safe side". For example, Chalkley gives a parenthetical note for one record indicating that he couldn't tell from the original source whether the person meant was "Hugh Keyes" or "Hugh Hayes". In this particular case, the record is probably for "Hugh Keyes", but has been included with the listing for Hugh Hays for the sake of the possibility that it really does refer to a Hugh Hays.
- *The number of entries under this name in the Index to Chalkley's Chronicles. The actual number of records may be larger (most likely) or smaller, depending on the accuracy of the index. Some records in Chalkley's for the target may not appear in the index, and other records may not be located on the page described. The former records are indicated in this column with "not", standing for "not found in the index". The latter records are indicated under "text" with a "?" Note that some records, not captured in Chalkelys index, may not appear at all in this listing.
- ** "Year" assigned may not be the year the record was made, but the year which appears to be related to the event described associated with the person of interest. For example, if testimony was entered into the court records in the year 1836 describing the Revolutionary War record of the target, then the assigned date is not 1836 (when the record was made) but approximate date 1776 (the start of the Revolution).
- ***This is the current "best guess" as to the identity of the person associated with this record. Note that it is not always possible to tell who a particular records applies to. If the record includes details of the persons family, then it's easier to make the identification. Sometimes no such information is available in the record, but there will be other clues (such as adjacent neighbors, etc) that allow the identification. In any case, sometimes one "John Smith" looks pretty much like another "John Smith", so take these identifications with a healthy grain of salt.
|
|
