Person:Elizabeth Kittredge (4)

Watchers
m. 8 Jul 1724
  1. Daniel Kittredge1725 - 1753
  2. Ruth Kittredge1726 - 1726/27
  3. Samuel Kittredge1727 - 1775
  4. Ruth Kittredge1729 -
  5. Nathan Kittredge1731 - 1781
  6. Mary Kittredge1733 - 1739
  7. Elizabeth Kittredge1734/35 - 1739
  8. Mehitabel Kittredge1736/37 - 1737
  9. Timothy Kittredge1738 - 1758
  10. Ebenezer Kittredge1739 - 1802
  11. Benjamin Kittredge1745 - 1751
Facts and Events
Name Elizabeth Kittredge
Gender Female
Birth? 3 Mar 1734/35 Tewksbury, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Death? 7 Dec 1739 Tewksbury, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
This person does not have any known living descendants.

Personal History

Elisabeth Kittredg(e), daughter of Daniel Kittredge (Jr.) and Ruth (Shed), was born 3 March 173[4/]5, in Tewksbury, Province of Massachusetts Bay.[1][3] She died 7 December 1739, in the same place.[2][3]

References
  1. “Tewksbury births”, in Vital Records of Tewksbury, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1912)
    p. 54.

    “KITTREDGE, Elisabeth, d. Daniel and Ruth, Mar. 3, 1735.”

  2. “Tewksbury deaths”, in Vital Records of Tewksbury, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1912)
    p. 220.

    “KITTREDGE, Elisabeth, d. Daniel and Ruth, Dec. 7, 1739.”

  3. 3.0 3.1 Tewksbury (Massachusetts). Town Clerk. Vital records, 1738-1897. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1972)
    FHL 771075; Births, deaths 1738–1852, p. 56.

    Digital record with image viewed in “Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626–2001,” database, FamilySearch, DGS 7010701, image 45 (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F4GG-1VL : accessed 16 Jan. 2017).

    “Elisabeth, daughter of Daniel & Ruth Kittredge, born March 3, 1735 … Elisabeth, daughter of Daniel & Ruth Kittredge, died Dec 7, 1739”

    The birth date of her sister Mehitabel, whose entry follows Elizabeth's, is written “March 1, 1737” with a death date of “April 21, 1737”. This implies that the dates were being recorded with January as the first month of the year. Hence, although Elisabeth could have been born March 3, 1735/6, she probably was born March 3, 1734/5.