Person talk:James Frost (10)

alternate births [25 April 2015]

The 1640 birth year is impossible, since the preceding sibling would have been born only 5 months prior to James in Nov 1639.

I neglected to correct to Jan 1639/40 and so Jan 1639 appeared to allow for a birth in Apr 1640. My bad.

But at the same time, you can't take unsourced pages at face value. The published record for Joseph says Jan 1639, not Nov 1639. Undoubtedly somewhere, month 11 is involved and it got interpreted wrong. --Jrich 05:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC) P.S. I also have learned to trust Cutter much less, and would now, 5 years later, not at all be surprised that he made an error. It would hardly be worth commenting on. --Jrich 05:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)