Person:William Runciman (20)

William Edward Runciman
m. Abt 1841
  1. Jane Elizabeth Runciman1842 - 1886
  2. William Edward Runciman1844 - 1910
m. 25 Jul 1872
  1. Jane Elizabeth Runciman1873 - 1950
  2. Anne Williams Runciman1874 - 1955
  3. Maud Margaret Runciman1876 - 1950
  4. Evelyn Runciman1877 - 1934
  5. Voilet Lander Runciman1885 - 1963
  6. Isabel Bishop Runciman1887 - 1973
  7. Robert John Runciman1890 - 1960
Facts and Events
Name[2] William Edward Runciman
Gender Male
Birth[3] 22 Feb 1844 Arthurstown, County Wexford, Ireland
Marriage 25 Jul 1872 St Peter's Church, Dist of Dublin South, Dublin, Irelandto Susan Propert Williams
Immigration[6] 1880 New Zealand
Alt Death[4][7] 1 Mar 1909 Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Death[5][8] 1 Mar 1910 Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
References
  1.   Jennifer Jelley and Diane Middleton. Scotland and Beyond, published 2004 (p34).
  2. Rootsweb Mailing List, Url: lists.rootsweb.com
    William RUNCIMAN & Susan Propert WILLIAMS, posted Jan 2002, extracted Jan 2008.
  3. Miscellaneous RUNCIMAN web searches and correspondence, Url: Various
    Birth 22 Feb 1844 (Arthurstown, IRL) Dth 1 Mar 1909 (Dunedin, OTG) William Edward s/o John RUNCIMAN & Elizabeth LANDER, from Descendants of William RUNCIMAN & Catherine WISHART, Fife, posted May 2006 by Jen Jelley, extracted Jan 2008.
  4. Ros Runciman. RUNCIMAN Corres., Recipient: Lorna Henderson, Address: New South Wales, Australia, Author E-mail:
    Birth 22 Feb 1844 Arthurstown, Ireland) Dth 1 Mar 1909 (New Zealand) William Edward s/o John RUNCIMAN & Elizabeth LANDERS, from tree of John RUNCIMAN's first family, rcvd Jun 2010.
  5. BDM: New Zealand fiche index- Birth Death Marriage, Record Type: New Zealand births deaths marriages (index on
    Dth 1910 William Edward RUNCIMAN, folio 665 (Dunedin Q1), extracted Jul 2010.
  6. Sailed on the "Catalonia", landing in Timaru. His wife sailed in 1883 with their 4 eldest children.
  7. The 1909 dth was of apparently a 30 mth yr old with a first name not recorded, William Edward is recorded in 1910Q1. Ros subsequently advised that Jean R. had said 1.3 190x, where x looked like 7 initially, and later a 9 - but she'll happily believe me
  8. (not immediately obvious in online index)