Person:Sarah Kingsbury (4)

Sarah Kingsbury
b.Abt 1635
m. Bef 1635
  1. Sarah KingsburyAbt 1635 - Bef 1687
  2. Mary Kingsbury1637 -
  3. Elizabeth Kingsbury1638 - 1661
  4. Joseph Kingsbury1640/41 -
  5. John Kingsbury1643 - 1669
  6. Eleazer Kingsbury1645 -
  7. Nathaniel Kingsbury1650 - 1694
m. 25 May 1652
  1. Sarah CrossmanAbt 1653 - 1688
  2. John Crossman1654 -
  3. Mary Crossman1655 - Aft 1675
  4. Robert Crossman1657 - Bef 1738
  5. Joseph Crossman1659 - Bef 1696
  6. Nathaniel Crossman1660 - 1675/76
  7. Eleazar Crossman1663/64 - 1667
  8. Elizabeth Crossman1665 -
  9. Samuel Crossman1667 -
  10. Mercy Crossman1669 -
  11. Thomas Crossman1671 -
  12. Susanna Crossman1672 -
Facts and Events
Name[1] Sarah Kingsbury
Gender Female
Birth[2] Abt 1635
Marriage 25 May 1652 Dedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Robert Crossman
Death? Bef 1687 Taunton, Bristol, Massachusetts, United StatesHusband remarried
References
  1. Dean, John Ward. "Genealogy of the Kingsburys of Dedham, Mass.", in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    Vol. 16, page 338.

    Children of Joseph Kingsbury and wife Millecent: Sarah m. Robert Crossman of Taunton, New England.
    [Note: no marriage date given: first child of Sarah listed as John b. 1654, but there was an earlier child Sarah born 1652-3 timeframe. Marriage found in Dedham records as 25 May 1652.]

  2. Kingsbury, Arthur Murray. Kingsbury genealogy: the genealogy of the descendants of Joseph Kingsbury of Dedham, Massachusetts, together with the descendants in several lines of Henry Kingsbury of Ipswich, Massachusetts and our Canadian cousins. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: [s.n.], 1962)
    p. 14-15.

    Children of Joseph Kingsbury and wife "Millicent, who perhaps was an 'Ames'": Sarah, b. 1635, d. Taunton 1686, m. 25 May 1652 Robert Crossman. Will of Joseph Kingsbury, dated 22 May 1675, proved 1 Jun 1676, names daughter Sarah Crossman, son-in-law Robert Crossman, among others.
    [Note: there appears to be no explicit birth or death record for Sarah, and the dates cited here appear to be estimates. Various estimates of the birth are possible based on her marriage date in 1652, but since the next known sibling is born 1637, the estimate given here of 1635 seems very likely to be close to the mark.]