Person:Sarah Haskett (1)

Watchers
Browse
Sarah Haskett
 
  • F.  Stephen Haskett (add)
  • M.  Elizabeth Hill (add)
m. 2 Aug 1659
  1. Elizabeth HaskettAbt 1662 - Bef 1740
  2. Stephen Haskett1668/69 - 1668/69
  3. Elias Haskett1670 -
  4. Mary Haskett1671/72 -
  5. Sarah Haskett1673/74 -
  6. Hannah Haskett1675 -
  7. Martha HaskettEst 1683 - 1746
m. 29 Jul 1702
  1. Samuel Ingersoll1703 - Bef 1706
  2. Mary Ingersoll1704 - Bef 1708
  3. Samuel Ingersoll1706 -
  4. Mary Ingersoll1708 -
  5. Nathaniel IngersollAbt 1710 - 1762
  6. John IngersollAbt 1712 -
Facts and Events
Name[2] Sarah Haskett
Gender Female
Birth[1] 5 Feb 1673/74 Salem, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 29 Jul 1702 Salem, Essex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Samuel Ingersoll
References
  1. Salem, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records to the End of the year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1916-1925)
    Vol. 1, p. 411.

    HASKET, Sara, d.Steephen and Elizabeth, [born] 5 : 12 m : 1673. CT.R.
    [Note: In old-styles dates, the twelfth month is February. For comparison to the modern calendar, it corresponds to the following year. More info may be found here.]

  2. Avery, Lillian Drake. A Genealogy of the Ingersoll family in America, 1629-1925: Comprising Descendants of Richard Ingersoll of Salem, Massachusetts, John Ingersoll of Westfield, Mass., and John Ingersoll of Huntington, Long Island. (New York: The Grafton Press, 1926)
    p. 16.

    Samuel Ingersoll [#40] m. (2) 22 Jan 1702 Sarah Haskett, d/o Capt. Stephen Haskett and Elizabeth Langdon, b. 5 Feb 1673.

  3.   Source:Torrey, Clarence Almon. New England Marriages Prior to 1700 lists the marriage of "Sarah Haskett (1665-)" in 1684 to a different Samuel Ingersoll. The marriage record in the Salem VRs (p. 3:537) lists the wife as Sarah ---, while "Sarah Haskit" m. 1702 this Samuel Ingersoll. One of Torrey's sources is Source:Perley, Sidney. History of Salem, Massachusetts, Vol. 1, p. 131 which "lacks date", but that page lists the wife of Torrey's Samuel Ingersoll as "Sarah ---", while this Samuel Ingersoll shown on p. 1:132 m. 29 Jul 1702 Sarah Haskett. Likewise he has represented the reverse of the presentation found in Source:Avery, Lillian Drake. Genealogy of the Ingersoll Family in America, 1629-1925, p. 9, another of his cited sources (this Samuel is on p. 16). No birth of Sarah Haskett in 1665 has been located and while the rest of Torrey's sources haven't been checked since he appears to have made an editing error, and his answer appears wrong.