Person:Samuel Sumner (19)

Samuel Sumner
d.1690
m. Abt 1656
  1. Abigail Sumner1657 - 1657/58
  2. Samuel Sumner1658/59 - 1690
  3. Waitstill Sumner1661 - 1748/49
  4. Mary Sumner1665 - 1723/24
  5. Jaazaniah Sumner1668 - 1690
  6. Rebecca Sumner1671 -
  7. William Sumner1673/74 - 1697
  8. Ebenezer Sumner1678 - 1752
m. 15 Mar 1683
Facts and Events
Name Samuel Sumner
Gender Male
Birth[1][2] 5 Feb 1658/59 Dorchester, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Christening[3] 13 Feb 1658/59 Dorchester, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 15 Mar 1683 Milton, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Experiance Blake
Death? 1690
Ancestral File Number 228B-LHL
Ancestral File Number FZ57-5R

"Lost in the Expedition of 1690 "(Three Generations of the Sumner Family. The American Genealogist.) ---- "probably died in 1690 in the expedition against Canada, in which he served as ensign in Capt. Withington's company" "Josselyn Family - Genealogical Research in England" by Elizabeth French. NEHGR July 1917. page 256.

References
  1. "Genealogical Research In England", in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    vol. 71, page 256, July 1917.

    Samuel Sumner, s/o Roger Sumner and Mary Joslin, b. Dorchester 5 Feb 1658/9, "probably" d. in 1690 expedition against Canada, m. Milton 15 Mar 1683/4 Experience Blake.

  2. Boston (Massachusetts). Record Commissioners. A Report of the Record Commissioners of the City of Boston: Containing Dorchester Births, Marriages, and Deaths to the End of 1825. (Boston, Massachusetts: Rockwell and Churchill, city printers, 1890)
    p. 6.

    Samuel Sumner the Son of Roger Sumner was Born the 5 : 12 : 1658. [5 Feb 1658/59]

  3. First Church (Dorchester, Massachusetts). Records of the First Church at Dorchester in New England, 1636-1734. (Boston, Massachusetts: G. H. Ellis, 1891)
    169.

    Samuell Sumner ye Sonne of Rodger Sumner 12 (12) 58.
    [In 1658, the 12th month was February of what we would consider 1659, but was then still part of 1658.]