Person:Cornelis Van Wormer (1)

Watchers
Cornelis Laurentse Van Wormer
b.c1672-1680 New Netherlands
 
  1. Cornelis Laurentse Van WormerEst 1672 to 1680 -
  2. Frederick Laurentse Van Wormer
  • HCornelis Laurentse Van WormerEst 1672 to 1680 -
  • WAnnatje Van Patten1676 - Bet 1715 & 1717
m. 9 Feb 1709
  1. Lawrence Cornelise Van Wormer - 1769
  2. Frederick Cornelise Van Wormer1712 - Aft 1767
  3. Anna Cornelise Van Wormer
  4. Johannes (Cornelise?) Van WormerAbt 1715 -
  • HCornelis Laurentse Van WormerEst 1672 to 1680 -
  • WAeltje Straet
m. 9 Feb 1709
Facts and Events
Name[1] Cornelis Laurentse Van Wormer
Gender Male
Birth[2][3] c1672-1680 New NetherlandsChanged: Date: 12 Oct 2012
Marriage Banns 29 Jan 1709 Albanyto Annatje Van Patten
Marriage 9 Feb 1709 Albanyto Annatje Van Patten
Marriage 9 Feb 1709 Albany, Albany, New York, United StatesDutch Reformed Church
to Aeltje Straet
Questionable information identified by WeRelate automation
To fix:Invalid date(s); edit the page to see message(s)
References
  1. Manuscript of William A. Brinkman of Dunnsville, N.Y., Record Type: Genealogical Notes of William A. Brinkman, Town Historian
    Van Wormer, page 2.
  2. Manuscript of William A. Brinkman of Dunnsville, N.Y., Record Type: Genealogical Notes of William A. Brinkman, Town Historian
    Van Wormer, page 1.
  3. Records of the First Dutch Reformed Church of Albany.

    Marriage record notes that Cornelis was "b. in Col. R". That "b" could also mean "banns", meaning that their intended marriage was announced in church previous to the marriage. This interpretation is more likely than "born".

  4.   Dana VanWormer-Schreder.

    7332 Balsam Court, Toledo, Ohio, 43615, dschred@utoledo.edu, 419-866-1805, www.danasdigs.net

  5.   Holland Society of New York, in Records of the Reformed Dutch Church of Albany, New York, 1683-1809,
    Part 2, 1700-1724, page 8, 1978.

    The record reads "Reg. Ma. Feb. 9 Cornelis Laurentse Van Wurmerik, y. m., b. Col. R., and Annatje Van Petten, wid. of Claas Sieverse".

  6.   There were two dates floated for his birth (1672, 1680) neither of which had any explanation for suggesting why that particular year was offered, nor were any sources cited. Likewise for his siblings.