Family:Thomas Pierce and Mary Wyman (1)

Parents: Thomas Pierce and Eliza Unknown Thomas Pierce b. 27 Feb 1670/71 Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States d. Bef 1708 Plainfield, Windham, Connecticut, United States	Parents: John Wyman and Mary Carter Mary Wyman b. 25 Jun 1674 Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States d. 15 Feb 1738/39 Killingly, Windham, Connecticut, United States

Family tree▼

Facts and Events

Marriage^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

27 Feb 1692/93

Children

		Birth	Death
1.	Thomas Pierce	10 Oct 1696 Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
2.	Ebenezer Pierce	10 Sep 1698 Plainfield, Windham, Connecticut, United States
3.	Elizabeth Pierce	23 Jul 1700 Plainfield, Windham, Connecticut, United States	5 Jul 1704 Plainfield, Windham, Connecticut, United States
4.	Amos Pierce	3 Aug 1702 Plainfield, Windham, Connecticut, United States

References

↑ Pierce, Frederic Beech, and Frederick Clifton Pierce. Pierce genealogy: being the record of the posterity of Thomas Pierce, an early inhabitant of Charlestown and afterwards Charlestown Village (Woburn), in New England, with wills, inventories, biographical sketches, etc. (Boston, Massachusetts: Frederic Beech Pierce (printed by J. S. Wesby & Son), 1882)
p. 36.

Thomas Pierce [#72], s/o Thomas Pierce [#23, p. 26, and first wife Eliza ---] m. 27 Feb 1692 Mary Wyman, b. 25 Jun 1674.
↑ Johnson, Edward F. Woburn Records of Births, Deaths, and Marriages . (Woburn, Massachusetts: Andrews, Cutler & Co., 1890-1919)
vol. 3, p. 314.

Mary Wyman and Thomas Pierce, ---, 1692-3.
↑ Bailey, Frederic W. (Frederic William). Early Massachusetts marriages prior to 1800: as found on ancient court records of the counties of Middlesex, Hampshire, Berkshire and Bristol; third book. (Worcester, Massachusetts: F.W. Bailey, 1914)
p. 114.

Thomas Pierce & Mary Wyman, Feb. 27, 1692/3.
↑ Source:Pierce, Frederic Beech. Pierce Genealogy, Being the Record of the Posterity of Thomas Pierce, p. 37, adds a son John, b. 10 Feb 1704, but this appears to be an error. The copy of Barbour records for Plainfield, p. 99, shows the birth of a John on 10 Feb 1723, but no John born 1704. It appears to be some sort of confusion for the grandson John born to the son Thomas and his wife Mary Parkhurst on 10 Feb 1723/4 (see p. 50 of Pierce) as suggested by the coincidence of 10 Feb in both births.