Family:Thomas Lambert and Mary Gilbert (1)

Watchers
Facts and Events
Marriage[1] 20 Apr 1862 Islington, Middlesex, EnglandSt. Peter's Church
Children
BirthDeath
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
5.
 
6.
 
7.
 
8.
 
References
  1. London Metropolitan Archives; London, England, in London, England. Church of England Marriages and Banns, 1754-1930. (Ancestry.com)
    Reference Number: p83/pet2/013.

    Page 87. Number 174 20th April 1862.
    Marriage solemnized at Saint Peter's Church in the Parish of Islington in the County of Middlesex.
    Thomas James Lambert, 22, bachelor, printer, 4 Cardigan Streeet, son of Thomas James Lambert, printer
    and
    Mary Anne Gilbert, 24, spinster, 2 Cardigan Street, daughter of Charles Gilbert, warehouseman
    Married in the District Church of St. Peter according to the Rites and Ceremoniews of the Established Church after Banns by me, Hugh Gwyne Baker, curate

  2.   Registration district: Islington; Sub registration district: Islington East; Enum Dist: 50b, in England. 1881 Census Schedules for England and Wales, Isle of Man and the Channel Islands: . (
    Kew, Richmond, Greater London TW9 4DU, United Kingdom:
    The National Archives (abbreviated TNA), formerly the UK General Register Office.)
    Class: RG11; Piece: 264; Folio: 92; Page: 5; GSU roll: 1341057.

    Household 377: 2 Rosemary Street
    Thomas Lambert, head, mar, 41, no occupation, born Clerkenwell
    Mary A. Lambert, wife, mar, 42, printing machine minder, born Clerkenwell
    Thomas Lambert, son, unm, 18, no occupation, born Clerkenwell
    Charles Lambert, son, unm, 16, printer's apprentice, born Islington
    Mary A. Lambert, daur, 13, machine boy, born Islington
    Louisa Lambert, daur, 11, scholar, born Islington
    Frederick Lambert, son, 9, scholar, born Islington
    Arthur Lambert, son, 7, scholar, born Islington
    Ernest Lambert, son, 5, scholar, born Islington
    Frank Lambert, son, 2, born Islington

    The occupations are given to the family members as per the original census image. It is always possible that the enumerator set them one line down to what was intended.