|
|
Users uploading GEDCOMs in 2007 or 2008 without any contributions in 2009 or later
Note: GEDCOMs whose recommended action has been completed are being gradually moved to Old GEDCOMs Archive.
- ArthurSB73 view deletion impact - Needs work
- Barak4u view deletion impact - Retention recommended (see talk page)
- Barrylodge1975 view deletion impact - Retention recommended (see talk page)
- Bettykay view deletion impact - Too big to delete
- Biebuyck view deletion impact - Reviewed/no substantial issues--Amelia 06:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Blueskies25 view deletion impact - Large but a mess. Further analysis needed. --Amelia 06:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Bobsmythe view deletion impact - Reviewed/no substantial issues. --Amelia 06:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Burnbankman view deletion impact - Reviewed/needs small living cleanup, otherwise fine.--Amelia 00:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Buttersmcginty view deletion impact - Reviewed/small living cleanup/minor formatting issues.--Amelia 00:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Bware752 view deletion impact - Reviewed/no substantial issues.--Amelia 00:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Bwhaley view deletion impact - Reviewed/no substantial issues.--Amelia 00:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- CGTurcotte view deletion impact - reviewed/large and interconnected / needs some living work --Amelia 05:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Califgmom view deletion impact - Reviewed/no substantial issues.--Amelia 00:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Carlton843 view deletion impact - Reviewed/No substantial issues.--Amelia 16:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Carol1945 view deletion impact - About 500 livings, but otherwise reasonable.--Amelia 16:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Carolgreene view deletion impact - About 300 livings, but a lot of overlap and reasonably complete pages. Might be a lot of Ancestral File nonsense, but it's been cleaned up of obvious problems if so.--Amelia 16:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Catgalvin view deletion impact - About 700 people, no overlap, a lot of names with no other information, but because they are related to main lines that have decent info. No loss in removing it, but it doesn't have to be.--Amelia 16:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ceburgoyne view deletion impact - Only 10 people. No living.--Amelia 05:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Celticspirit view deletion impact - reviewed, no substantial issues.--Amelia 05:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cerris view deletion impact - Reviewed. Census mysources need converting, but otherwise no substantial issues.--Amelia 05:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cgsparks view deletion impact - About 1100 people. At least 10% will be deleted if speedy deletes are done. Of the rest, a lot of European reverse dates picked up from WorldTree. It would be no loss if it were deleted, but I don't feel strongly.--Amelia 01:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Cherylhoxie view deletion impact -- over half of the 2800 pages are interconnected, the rest is solid. Keep.--Amelia 04:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Chessjcc view deletion impact -- lots of empty pages (e.g., names of 8 children entered when only one has any information), but they don't seem necessarily wrong, and about a quarter overlapping, so would probably cause more problems then it would save by deleting. Keep.--Amelia 04:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Chief view deletion impact - about 500 people, mostly with dates and places. Keep.--Amelia 04:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Claurence view deletion impact - Retention recommended, over 5000 people it is not possible to delete. about 500 livings. Daniel Maxwell 06:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- All pages with name=Living have been addressed, but there may be others whose names are included and who are still living that need to be deleted. The quality of this tree is mixed - several errors were found and corrected, but there may be many more.--DataAnalyst 16:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Clocktech view deletion impact - Retention recommended, some livings but has too many overlaps to delete. Daniel Maxwell 06:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Coret view deletion impact - Retention recommended, over 4000 people, too many to be able to delete. Daniel Maxwell 06:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Cousincarol view deletion impact - Retention recommended - small, most have dates and placed. Daniel Maxwell 19:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Coxtree view deletion impact 0 Retention recommended, about 300 people and around 15 livings, it could be cleaned up. Daniel Maxwell 19:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Crazyqhub view deletion impact - Too big to delete at 2000+ people, too many connections. No livings. Daniel Maxwell 19:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Csorbe view deletion impact - Retention Recommended. 50+ people, mostly 19th century and all have to seem dates. Could be cleaned up. Daniel Maxwell 19:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Cunningb view deletion impact - 10000+ people, many New England colonial connections, cannot delete. Over 500 livings. Daniel Maxwell 19:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Dale view deletion impact - 3000 people, a lot of overlap. Mostly good dates/places, small handful of living. No reason to delete. Retention recommended.--Amelia 15:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Dalton J. Nix view deletion impact - a little over a thousand people, some crossover, quality is fair and most people have dates. Retention recommended.
- Dappel view deletion impact - a single person, but one with information on it. Orphan, but could easily be fixed. Retention recommended.
- Darrellwarner view deletion impact - Over 10K people, too big to delete. No "livings", most have dates. Retention Recommended. Still hundreds of probably living with no dates, gradually being deleted.--Rhian 08:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Hundreds of living removed in last 6 weeks --Susan Irish 05:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- DavePeterson view deletion impact - Mostly 19th century, has some sources, about livings. Retention recommended.
- Davehaynes view deletion impact - About 650 people, mostly 17th and 18th century with alot of crossover. Fair quality. No major issues.
- Davisfam2000 view deletion impact - Gigantic, and no big issues. Not worth the pain of deleting.--Amelia 05:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Davisfam2000 view deletion impact - only 13 people, looks fine.--Amelia 05:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Daymorrison view deletion impact- Needs a UID cleanup, and has a fair number of missing dates, but not too bad.--Amelia 05:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Debbiemayse view deletion impact
- Defane view deletion impact
- Defane view deletion impact
- Dellabeaver view deletion impact
- Dennischap view deletion impact
- Dgstuart view deletion impact
- Dhagner view deletion impact
- Dhagner view deletion impact
- Dhagner view deletion impact
- Dickdee82 ---> Probably living persons + no date + no place (about 125 contributions) ... I added a speedy delete template. - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 07:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dlmorley view deletion impact
- Donsis view deletion impact
- Dpsnyder view deletion impact
- Drearden view deletion impact
- Dreed47 view deletion impact
- Drewwalkerski view deletion impact
- Drippingrose view deletion impact
- Dtutt view deletion impact
- Durry 42 view deletion impact
- Eboston view deletion impact
- Eboston view deletion impact
- EdgarKhan view deletion impact
- Eejjennings view deletion impact
- Eejjennings view deletion impact
- Eejjennings view deletion impact
- Eguardia view deletion impact
- Elainep view deletion impact
- Elliejohn view deletion impact
- FDMickelson view deletion impact - 1500 people, over half of which overlap. Rest appear clean, no living. Recommend keep.--Amelia 05:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Familytree view deletion impact - Reasonably clean, about 3000 people. Recommend keep.
- Flaxin view deletion impact
- Floris view deletion impact
- Fosdick view deletion impact
- Frank Hahn view deletion impact
- Frankandjeansboy view deletion impact
- Frankyaccino view deletion impact
- Freiland view deletion impact
- Freiland view deletion impact
- Fsieber view deletion impact - Retention recommended. 10000+ people, too big to delete. About 300 livings. Daniel Maxwell 01:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fwgarnerjr view deletion impact
- G.h.vandoorn view deletion impact
- G1H2ost view deletion impact
- GRANDMAPIGGY view deletion impact
- Garbett view deletion impact
- Gayle hynds view deletion impact
- Gaylecferguson view deletion impact
- Gbagoly view deletion impact
- Gdtreat view deletion impact
- Gemwood view deletion impact
- Genealogist84 view deletion impact
- Many persons with missing birth year - many of these are for living individuals, and thus need to be deleted.--DataAnalyst 17:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Geoffatberk view deletion impact
- Ggoldsmith view deletion impact
- Ginnysanchez view deletion impact - A few pages with name Living still to be deleted, pending response from a current watcher. About 680 pages with birth year missing, many of which are likely for living persons and need to be reviewed and deleted.--DataAnalyst 16:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Glenda Edwards Boyajan view deletion impact - Moderate-sized tree (about 1400 persons) integrated with other 17th century and earlier trees. Some of the later records appear to be contaminated by sources that combine records for different people. This part of the tree needs to be untangled or deleted.--DataAnalyst 16:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- GreenFairy view deletion impact
- GreyWolf53 view deletion impact
- Griffith view deletion impact
- Grobitai view deletion impact
- Gruf view deletion impact
- Gtcurtis view deletion impact
- Guenther view deletion impact
- Happyacres view deletion impact
- Harry Carson view deletion impact
- Hassell47 view deletion impact
- Hattonjason view deletion impact
- Headacres view deletion impact
- Henandlin view deletion impact
- Hendrik view deletion impact
- Herschel view deletion impact
- Hh219 view deletion impact
- Hilaryf view deletion impact
- Hollowaysw view deletion impact
- Holyhabanero view deletion impact
- Holyhabanero view deletion impact
- Holyhabanero view deletion impact
- Holyhabanero view deletion impact
- Hout view deletion impact
- HowardH view deletion impact
- Hraz view deletion impact
- Hughbeck view deletion impact
- JSeery view deletion impact - Rentention recommended.
- Analysis: 2533 pages (1869P/630F/34MS); deletion impact = 835 links; I've been slowly cleaning up the syntax issues with this tree as part of another project, however Sources are still desperately needed on most pages without multiple watchers. --cos1776 13:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Jameslhahn view deletion impact - Keep. Too intertwined.
- Namespaces: Family (2713) Person (7091). Last action 2008. No activity since upload. --cos1776 19:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Where there are few watchers, the quality is sometimes low - there appears to be more than average ascribing of individuals to the wrong family and conflation of individuals.--DataAnalyst 21:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- I trust your opinion. If you feel it should be removed, I am ok with that. --cos1776 02:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- I wouldn't remove it because it is too intertwined, but I'd like to leave it on this list for further review in the future.--DataAnalyst 02:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Jandmhaines@msn.com view deletion impact - Keep. Too intertwined.
- Namespaces: Family (588) MySource (141) Person (1563). Impact: 1219. Last action 2007. No activity since upload. --cos1776 19:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Janfreiland view deletion impact - Pending (working on it --cos1776 21:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- Namespaces: Family (168) MySource (1) Person (790). Impact:55. Last action 2007. 3 edits (in 2007) since upload. Lots of syntax issues (capitalized surnames, broken place links, etc.).
- It appears that many or all sources in the GEDCOM were somehow replaced with MySource:Joyce007/Arkansas Marriage Index, 1933-1939 - Ancestry.com, resulting in a loss of what the source actually was. I think that all pages linked to this MySource should be updated to remove the source citation, as it is unreliable and could confuse future researchers.--DataAnalyst 00:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- I am working on deleting pages that say Living, but there are also a lot of pages that have a name and the person is living - they will need to be deleted as well.--DataAnalyst 21:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Mission2 view deletion impact
- Missourichick view deletion impact
- Mittens784 view deletion impact
- Mittens784 view deletion impact
- Mjmcara view deletion impact
- Mlatchu view deletion impact
- Mlcd view deletion impact - no longer any pages with name living, but still likely pages for living persons that will need to be deleted.--DataAnalyst 18:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Mmaffitt view deletion impact
- Mmickelson view deletion impact
- Morrisdatter view deletion impact - Needs cleanup to remove married name from name of many women. However, farm name should not be removed from Scandinavian records.--DataAnalyst 18:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Mpress view deletion impact
- Msdny view deletion impact
- Msmarx view deletion impact
- Msubasic view deletion impact
- Mtnee1 view deletion impact
- Mtpina2 view deletion impact
- Mumbag view deletion impact
- MusicAngel415 view deletion impact
- Mwhitehead68 view deletion impact
- Neilosufan view deletion impact
- Neilungerleider view deletion impact
- Nerak view deletion impact
- Newfie girl view deletion impact
- Nhendrickson view deletion impact
- Nickray view deletion impact
- Nicksayers view deletion impact
- Normkoegel view deletion impact
- Northcountry Genie view deletion impact
- Nosneb74 view deletion impact
- Nsorofman view deletion impact
- Nstok view deletion impact
- Nutter view deletion impact
- Oblyvia view deletion impact
- Oceans973 view deletion impact
- OhioRosie view deletion impact
- Olcampbell view deletion impact
- OliviaRevits view deletion impact
- OliviaRevits view deletion impact
- OliviaRevits view deletion impact
- OliviaRevits view deletion impact
- Opopenoe view deletion impact
- PKCass view deletion impact
- PackratsCorner view deletion impact
- Padraic view deletion impact
- Pansyjune view deletion impact
- Parksboss view deletion impact
- Pattyc 2003 view deletion impact - used OneWorldTree as a source, resulting in some nonsense that has been removed. Need to check for more.--DataAnalyst 17:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pattyih view deletion impact
- Paz view deletion impact
- Pdforester view deletion impact
- Peitxon view deletion impact
- Pelark view deletion impact
- Penelope Blake view deletion impact
- Pilgrim957 view deletion impact
- Pinkerous view deletion impact
- Pinkerous view deletion impact
- Pinkerous view deletion impact
- Pintarelli view deletion impact
- Pippy oak view deletion impact
- Pirate99 view deletion impact
- Polly43 view deletion impact
- Pondus view deletion impact
- Preacher61md view deletion impact
- Presley view deletion impact
- Prophecy1821 view deletion impact
- Psychobarb view deletion impact
- Quisp view deletion impact
- RFillerup view deletion impact
- RJSprague view deletion impact
- RJSprague view deletion impact
- Ravencrest view deletion impact
- Rawlbret view deletion impact
- Raychell2006 view deletion impact
- Rcasa view deletion impact
- Rchrch view deletion impact
- Rdegnen view deletion impact
- Readinnut view deletion impact
- Readinnut view deletion impact
- RebeccaW view deletion impact
- Rebeccahill view deletion impact
- Redcowboyhat view deletion impact
- Regets view deletion impact
- Rempel view deletion impact
- Retrac view deletion impact
- Revans view deletion impact
- Rewarren view deletion impact
- Reznorite view deletion impact
- Riaan view deletion impact
- Richardwsweet view deletion impact
- Rickcrume view deletion impact
- Rickm373 view deletion impact
- Rickpitt view deletion impact
- Rickroberts view deletion impact
- Riverdance view deletion impact
- Rjfoxx view deletion impact - I have corrected some errors where the Soc Security Death Index record for a married woman was used as the information for a woman whose maiden name matched the index. There may be more like this. The small part of this tree I worked on was reliable in terms of names, but not dates.--DataAnalyst 01:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rlowrie01 view deletion impact - one person page with incorrect info and one mysource - both deleted.--DataAnalyst 23:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rmtsmith view deletion impact
- Rmtsmith view deletion impact
- Robber view deletion impact
- Robphelps view deletion impact
- Robroy view deletion impact
- Rogercubs view deletion impact
- Romberg view deletion impact
- Rorajoyce view deletion impact
- Rryalls view deletion impact
- Rskeene view deletion impact
- Rtlawson view deletion impact
- Rwbdragon view deletion impact
- Rwhitham view deletion impact
- Rwillimon view deletion impact
- Sammi view deletion impact
- SanArnold view deletion impact
- SanArnold view deletion impact
- SanArnold view deletion impact
- Sandrah view deletion impact
- Sandrup view deletion impact - User deleted tree 27 Dec 2017--DataAnalyst 23:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sandyink view deletion impact
- Sandyscouter view deletion impact
- Sareidwerelate view deletion impact
- Scarbelly view deletion impact
- Scottyfred view deletion impact
- Sdix00 view deletion impact
- SelenaManley view deletion impact
- Shannon.tolen view deletion impact
- Sharon1948 view deletion impact
- Sherroc view deletion impact - Too intertwined to delete, but needs some careful review. Found and fixed several cases of people clearly not in the correct family (wrong generation - sometimes birth year off by 30+ years). There are likely more like this. And probably still many living individuals.--DataAnalyst 00:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Shgalitz view deletion impact
- Sidniestone view deletion impact
- Sip view deletion impact
- Skmaguire view deletion impact
- Slamontine view deletion impact
- Slknowles view deletion impact
- Slorson view deletion impact
- Smithbryant view deletion impact
- Sogzewalla view deletion impact
- Sonofaforester view deletion impact
- Sschombg view deletion impact
- Stang view deletion impact
- Starfam view deletion impact
- Stephenmk view deletion impact
- Stilldoc view deletion impact
- Stilldoc view deletion impact
- Storknurse view deletion impact
- StuDean view deletion impact
- Suecarla view deletion impact
- Suefitz view deletion impact
- Susanvw view deletion impact
- Susanvw view deletion impact
- Suzette view deletion impact
- SwellChel view deletion impact
- TFUGMAN view deletion impact
- Tagazio view deletion impact
- Taggart view deletion impact
- Taichi view deletion impact
- Tarashaver616 view deletion impact
- Taylormade view deletion impact
- Tecbarclay view deletion impact
- Teresaward view deletion impact
- Terryavis view deletion impact
- Test2 view deletion impact
- Tfb6972 view deletion impact
- Thecouches view deletion impact
- Themaceffs view deletion impact
- Thetaggart view deletion impact
- Thomas derdeyn view deletion impact
- Thomasmcclure view deletion impact
- Timsullivan view deletion impact
- Tired82 view deletion impact
- Tlesher view deletion impact
- Tlesher view deletion impact
- Tmacentee view deletion impact
- TomTullis view deletion impact
- Tommyjl view deletion impact
- TreeClimber view deletion impact
- Trickrtreat view deletion impact
- Trucklady1 view deletion impact
- Tsprague1 view deletion impact
- Turkeypants view deletion impact
- TurnerMcKee view deletion impact
- Tyme2play1 view deletion impact
- Urset view deletion impact
- Vangale view deletion impact
- Ve4tjr view deletion impact
- Vmccrae view deletion impact
- Walkingguy view deletion impact
- Wallisguy view deletion impact
- Waruju view deletion impact
- Wbyeats view deletion impact
- Weiseone view deletion impact
- Williamknight57 view deletion impact
- Williamww view deletion impact
- Wills2003 view deletion impact
- WiseLalia view deletion impact
- WiseLalia view deletion impact
- Wlonie view deletion impact
- Wmorgel view deletion impact
- Wquirke view deletion impact
- Wt4y view deletion impact
- Wvbower view deletion impact
- Wvrose view deletion impact
- Wwalker view deletion impact
- Xhepera view deletion impact
- Xpm17503 view deletion impact
- Xpm17503 view deletion impact
- YJ Norton view deletion impact - Retention Recommended
- Yo adrian eh view deletion impact - Retention Recommended
- Yoseph619 view deletion impact - Retention Recommended
|
|
