ViewsWatchers |
[add comment] [edit] WelcomeWelcome to WeRelate, your virtual genealogical community. We're glad you have joined us. At WeRelate you can easily create ancestor web pages, connect with cousins and other genealogists, and find new information. To get started:
If you need any help, we will be glad to answer your questions. Just go to the Support page, click on the Add Topic link, type your message, then click the Save Page button. Thanks for participating and see you around! --Support 09:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC) [add comment] [edit] Next step: Review your GEDCOM [5 December 2020]You're not done yet! Now that you have uploaded finn etter Family Tree 12-5.ged into our review program, it is time for you to match your data to ours. Your next step is to review and resolve any potential warnings that your file might be showing and to match place names, source names and families to pages that may already exist in our database. Notes:
Click here to enter the review program WeRelate is different from most family tree websites. By contributing here you are helping to create Pando for genealogy, a free, unified family tree that combines the best information from all contributors.
[add comment] [edit] finn etter Family Tree 12-5.ged Imported Successfully [6 December 2020]Congratulations! The pages from your GEDCOM have been generated successfully. Now you can:
For questions or problems, leave a message for the volunteers on our GEDCOM review team.
[add comment] [edit] Review of your gedcom [6 December 2020]Hi! I've reviewed your GEDCOM, and wanted to tell you about what was imported. First off, entries for living people are not allowed on WeRelate. Import by Gedcom is not allowed for most people born before 1750 (although manual entry is allowed). The system automatcally disallows import of these two kinds of entries, so these entries have not been imported. Besides that, I found three couples with no dates or places or sources, which is problematic. Generally there needs to be some information which allows others to identify (or exclude) people. There were also about nine people with unacceptable text in their name fields. For example, one was named "THOMAS, Major, “1747 (slaves), #1. Phillip Edit marriages M.D." and another was named "WATERS *1755, *MILLICENT". Normally, with problems like the latter the procedure would have been to return the Gedcom to you without import until you had corrected the various problems. In this case, since the bulk of the gedcom was suitable, I decided to exclude by hand these two further groups of entries and proceed with the import of the rest. --robert.shaw 22:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC) |