Person:Sarah Johnson (15)

Browse
m. 21 Sep 1613
  1. Mary Johnson1614 - 1678/79
  2. Capt Isaac Johnson1615/16 - 1675
  3. John Johnson1618 - 1627
  4. Elizabeth Johnson1619 - 1683/84
  5. Humphrey Johnson1620 - 1693
  6. Joseph Johnson1622 - 1622
  7. Susan Johnson1623 - 1629
  8. Sarah Johnson1624 - 1681/82
  9. Joseph Johnson1626/27 - 1627
  10. Hannah Johnson1627/28 -
  • HHugh Burt1621 - Bef 1650
  • WSarah Johnson1624 - 1681/82
m. Bef 1647
  1. Mary Burt1647 -
  2. Sarah BurtEst 1649 -
m. Est 1657
  1. Esther Bartram1658 - 1728
  2. Rebecka Bartram1658 -
  3. Eleanor Bartram1660 -
  4. Hannah Bartram
  5. Susannah Bartram
Facts and Events
Name Sarah Johnson
Gender Female
Christening[1][2] 12 Nov 1624 Ware, Hertfordshire, England
Marriage Bef 1647 to Hugh Burt
Marriage Est 1657 to William Bartram
Death? 5 Jan 1681/82 Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Alt Death? 5 Jan 1683
References
  1. Sarah Johnson, in Richardson, Douglas. The Heath Connection: English Origins of Isaac and William Heath of Roxbury, Massachusetts, John Johnson, Edward Morris, and Elizabeth (Morris) Cartwright. New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (New England Historic Genealogical Society, Jul 1992)
    146:275.

    Sarah, bp. at Ware 12 Nov. 1624

  2. entry for John Johnson, in Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England, 1620-1633. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1995)
    2:1108-9.

    'SARAH bp. Ware 12 November 1624; m. (1) by 1647 Hugh Burt (possibly Hannah below was his wife); m. (2) by July 1653 William Bartram (child b. before April 1654). ...
    While there is no doubt that one of the five children named by John Johnson in his will was at one time the wife of Hugh Burt, it is not certain which daughter, Sarah or Hannah, she might have been. Sarah is the more likely candidate, and if it was she, then she went on to marry William Bartram. This difficult and unsolved problem has been discussed by Helen S. Ullmann and by Dean Crawford Smith and Melinde Lutz Sanborn [TEG 6:178-84; Angell Anc 390; see also NEHGR 149:230-39].'