Person:Rhoda Dewing (1)

m. 23 Sep 1760
  1. Sarah Dewing1761 - 1768
  2. Rhoda Dewing1762 - 1834
  3. Abigail Dewing1765 - 1768
  4. Rebecca Dewing1766 - 1805
m. 24 Jun 1779
  1. Rhoda Hunting1780 -
  2. Charles Hunting1783 - 1861
  3. Mehitable Hunting1785 - 1865
  4. Israel Hunting1787 - 1865
  5. Calvin Hunting1789 -
  6. Julia Hunting1793 - 1865
  7. Luther Hunting1795 - Bef 1801
  8. Timothy Hunting1798 -
  9. Luther Hunting1801 - 1842
  10. Nahum Hunting1804 -
Facts and Events
Name[1][2] Rhoda Dewing
Gender Female
Birth[2][3] 11 Oct 1762 Natick, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 24 Jun 1779 Needham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Israel Hunting
Death[2] 1 Jul 1834 Needham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United StatesCitation needed
References
  1. Winship, J. P. C. Historical Brighton: an illustrated history of Brighton and its citizens. (Boston, Massachusetts: George A. Warren, 1899-1902, c1899-c1902)
    Vol 2, pp. 212-213.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Dewing, Benjamin Franklin. Descendants of Andrew Dewing of Dedham, Mass: with notes on some English families of the name. (Boston: T.R. Marvin & Son, 1904)
    pp 27-29.

    Rhoda Dewing, b. 11 Oct 1762, bp. 24 Oct 1762, d. Needham 1 Jul 1734, m. 24 Jun 1779 Israel Hunting.
    [Note: comment on incorrect parents in town records: "which I think an error". Husband's death date given as 1 Jun 1734, which appears correct from documents in his probate (Norfolk Probate 10376, but no death record, gravestone found for Rhoda. Petitions dated 1846 say he left a widow, 6 children and representatives of two deceased children, not clear if that was as of the date of petition or date of death, since probate wasn't opened until 12 years after his death. So the basis for 1 Jul 1834 is unknown, and seems suspect.]

  3. Natick, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Natick, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Mass: Stanhope Press, 1910)
    p. 33.

    DEWING, Rhode, d. of Timothy and Eunice, [born] Oct. 11, 1762.
    [Note: no other children record for Timothy and Eunice, appears to be an error.]