Person:Hannah Emerson (2)

m. 1 Apr 1657
  1. Hannah Emerson1657 - Bef 1737/38
  2. John Emerson1659 - 1659
  3. Mary Emerson1660 -
  4. Lieutenant John Emerson1661/62 - 1745
  5. Elder Samuel Emerson1663 - Bet 1739 & 1743
  6. Elizabeth Emerson1665 - 1693
  7. Abigail Emerson1667 - 1667
  8. Jonathan Emerson1669/70 - 1736
  9. Abigail Emerson1671 - Aft 1746
  10. Judith Emerson1673 - 1673
  11. Judith Emerson1674 - 1677
  12. Joshua Emerson1675/76 - 1676
  13. Ruth Emerson1677 - 1677
  14. Joshua Emerson1678 - 1742
  15. Susanna Emerson1680 - 1680
  • HThomas DustonAbt 1652 - Bef 1732
  • WHannah Emerson1657 - Bef 1737/38
m. 3 Dec 1677
  1. Hannah Duston1678 - Aft 1754
  2. Elizabeth Duston1680 - 1746
  3. Mary Duston1681 - 1696
  4. Thomas Dustin1683 - 1767
  5. Nathaniel Dustin1685 - 1762
  6. John Dustin1686 - 1689
  7. Sarah Dustin1688 -
  8. Abigail Dustin1690 - 1727
  9. Jonathan Dustin1691 - Bef 1757
  10. Mehitable Dustin1694 - 1694
  11. Timothy Dustin1694 - Bef 1741
  12. Martha Dustin1696/97 - 1696/97
  13. Lydia Duston1698 -
Facts and Events
Name[4] Hannah Emerson
Married Name Hannah Duston
Gender Female
Birth[2] 23 Dec 1657 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 3 Dec 1677 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Thomas Duston
Will[3] 19 Sep 1733
Death[3] Bef 6 Mar 1737/38 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States (probably)Between date of will and date of probate.
Burial[4] Pentucket Cemetery, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Probate[3] 6 Mar 1737/38 Will Proved
Reference Number? Q155325?


the text in this section is copied from an article in Wikipedia

Hannah Duston (also spelled Dustin, Dustan, or Durstan) (born Hannah Emerson, December 23, 1657 – March 6, 1736, 1737 or 1738) was a colonial Massachusetts Puritan woman who was taken captive by Abenaki people from Quebec during King William's War, with her newborn daughter, during the Raid on Haverhill in 1697, in which 27 colonists were killed. In her account she stated that the Abenaki killed her baby during the journey to the island. While detained on an island in the Merrimack River in present-day Boscawen, New Hampshire, she killed and scalped ten of the Native American family members holding them hostage, with the assistance of two other captives.

Duston's captivity narrative became famous more than 100 years after she died. During the 19th century, she was referred to as a folk hero and the "mother of the American tradition of scalp-hunting." Some scholars assert Duston's story became legend in the 19th century only because the United States used her story to defend its violence against Native Americans as innocent, defensive, and virtuous. Duston is believed to be the first American woman honored with a statue.


the text in this section is copied from an article in Wikipedia

Contents

Early life

Hannah Emerson was born December 23, 1657, in Haverhill, Massachusetts, to Michael Emerson and Hannah Webster Emerson; she was the oldest of 15 children. At age 20, she married Thomas Duston Jr., a farmer and brick-maker. The Emerson family had previously been the subject of attention when Elizabeth Emerson, Hannah's younger sister, was hanged for infanticide on June 8, 1693. One of Hannah's cousins, Martha Toothaker Emerson, and her father, Roger Toothaker, were accused of practicing witchcraft and tried at the Salem witch trials (1692–93).[1]

Captivity

During King William's War, Hannah, her husband Thomas, and their nine children, including a newborn baby, lived in Haverhill, Massachusetts. On March 15, 1697, when she was 40 years old, the town was raided by a group of about 30 Abenaki from Quebec. In the attack, 27 colonists were killed (most of them children), and 13 were taken captive, to be either adopted or held as hostages for the French. Hannah's husband Thomas, who was building a new brick home about half a mile away, fled with eight of the nine children.[2] The Indians captured Hannah and her nurse, Mary Neff (1646-1722, nee Corliss), set fire to Hannah's home, and forced the two women to march into the wilderness, Hannah carrying her newborn daughter, Martha. According to the account Hannah gave to Cotton Mather, along the way her captors killed six-day-old Martha by smashing her head against a tree:

About 19 or 20 Indians now led these away, with about half a score of other English captives, but ere they had gone many steps, they dash'd out the brains of the infant against a tree, and several of the other captives, as they began to tire in the sad journey, were soon sent unto their long home.[3]

Hannah and Mary were assigned to a family group of 12 people (probably Pennacooks) and taken north, "unto a rendezvous...somewhere beyond Penacook; and they still told these poor women that when they came to this town, they must be stript, and scourg'd, and run the gauntlet through the whole army of Indians."[3] The group included Samuel Lennardson (1683-1718, also spelled Leonardson, Lenorson or Lennarson), a 14-year-old boy captured in Worcester, Massachusetts, in late 1695.[4][5]

Massacre and escape

The captives were taken north to an island in the Merrimack River at the mouth of the Contoocook River, where, during the night of April 29 or 30, while the Indians were sleeping, Hannah led Mary and Samuel in a revolt:

...furnishing themselves with hatchets for the purpose, they struck home such blows upon the heads of their sleeping oppressors, that ere they could any of them struggle...they fell down dead.[3]

Hannah used a hatchet to kill one of the two grown men (Lennardson killed the second),[4] two adult women, and six children. According to Cotton Mather's account, Hannah and her partners let one of the children sleep, "intending to bring him away with them," but the boy awoke and escaped.[1] One severely wounded Abenaki woman also managed to escape the attack.

The former captives immediately left in a canoe, after scalping the dead as proof of the incident and to collect a bounty. They went downriver, traveling only during the night, and after several days reached Haverhill.

Reward

A few days later, Thomas Duston brought Hannah, Samuel and Mary to Boston, along with the scalps, the hatchet and a flintlock musket they had taken from the Indians.[6] Although New Hampshire had become a colony in its own right in 1680, the Merrimack River and its adjacent territories were considered part of Massachusetts; therefore, Hannah and the other former captives applied to the Massachusetts Government for the scalp bounty. The state of Massachusetts had posted a bounty of 50 pounds per scalp in September 1694, which was reduced to 25 pounds in June 1695, and then entirely repealed in December 1696.[7][2] Wives had no legal status at that time in colonial New England, so her husband petitioned the Legislature on behalf of Hannah Duston, requesting that the bounties for the scalps be paid, even though the law providing for them had been repealed:

The Humble Petition of Thomas Durstan of Haverhill Sheweth That the wife of ye petitioner (with one Mary Neff) hath in her Late captivity among the Barbarous Indians, been disposed & assisted by heaven to do an extraordinary action, in the just slaughter of so many of the Barbarians, as would by the law of the Province which [only] a few months ago, have entitled the actors unto considerable recompense from the Publick. That tho the [want] of that good Law [warrants] no claims to any such consideration from the publick, yet your petitioner humbly [asserts] that the merit of the action still remains the same; & it seems a matter of universal desire thro the whole Province that it should not pass unrecompensed... Your Petitioner, Thomas Durstun[8]

On June 16, 1697, the Massachusetts General Court voted to give them a reward for killing their captors; Hannah Duston received 25 pounds, and Neff and Lennardson[4] split another 25 pounds:

Vote for allowing fifty pounds to Thomas Dustun in behalf of his wife Hannah, and to Mary Neff, and Samuel Leonardson, captives escaped from the Indians, for their service in slaying their captors. Voted, in concurrence with the representatives, that there be allowed and ordered, out of the public treasury, unto Thomas Dunston of Haverhill, on behalf of Hannah his wife, the sum of twenty-five pounds; to Mary Neffe, the sum of twelve pounds ten shillings; and to Samuel Leonardson, the sum of twelve pounds ten shillings...as a reward for their service.

Later life

Following her return, Hannah gave birth to a daughter, Lydia, on October 4, 1698. Her neighbor Hannah Heath Bradley, who had also been abducted in the 1697 raid (and two of her children killed), was held for nearly two years before she was ransomed, returning to Haverhill in 1699. During Queen Anne's War Indians raided Haverhill again in 1704 and 1707. In yet another raid on Haverhill (1708), Algonquin and Abenaki Indians led by the French officer Jean-Baptiste Hertel de Rouville killed sixteen, including the town's minister.[1]

Although she claimed to have been baptized as a child, Hannah rarely attended church and did not take communion until late in life, for reasons that are unclear. In May 1724 she asked to be formally admitted to the Haverhill Center Congregational Church.[9] Her husband had made a similar petition in January of that year.[1]

Following her husband's death (between 1724 and 1732) Hannah Duston is believed to have lived with her son Jonathan on his farm in southwest Haverhill. She probably died between 1736 and 1738,[10] and was most likely buried near Jonathan Duston's home.[10]

Samuel Lennardson moved to Preston, Connecticut, to join his father.[2] He married and had five children and died on May 11, 1718.[4] Mary Neff died in Haverhill on October 17, 1722. In 1739 Mary Neff's son Joseph was granted two hundred acres of land at Penacook by the General Court of New Hampshire "in consideration of his mother's services in assisting Hannah Duston in killing divers Indians."[10]

This page uses content from the English Wikipedia. The original content was at Hannah Duston. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. As with WeRelate, the content of Wikipedia is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
References
  1.   Hannah Duston, in Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia.
  2. Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Haverhill, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Mass.: Topsfield Historical Society, 1910)
    1:122.

    Emmerson, Hannah, d. Michael and Hannah (Webster), [born] Dec. 23, 1657.

  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Hoyt, David W. "The Duston Family of Haverhill", in Essex Institute Historical Collections. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute Press)
    46:350.

    Thomas Duston, m. 3 Dec 1677 Hannah Emerson. Will of wid. Hannah dated 19 Sep 1733, proved 6 Mar 1737-38.

  4. 4.0 4.1 Pope, Charles Henry. The Haverhill Emersons. (Boston, Mass.; Cambridge, Mass.: Murray and Emery, 1913; 1916)
    1:19-20.

    Hannah2 (Emerson), one of the most famous women of early New England, was b. at Haverhill Dec. 23, 1657; m. Dec 3, 1677, Thomas Duston. She was captured by the Indians in one of their attacks on the settlement, March 15, 1697, taken from her bed with her infant of 6 days, and compelled to march with her captors. Seeing her child dashed to death against a tree; worn, with long marching and cruelties, after going with the Indians for two weeks she and Mrs. Neff and a boy, Samuel Lennerson, rose in the night, killed and scalped ten Indians and made their way home through intolerable hardships. She carried the scalps to Boston and was paid the regular bounty. Her deed was one of the chief means of checking the cruelties of the Indians, showing them that "weak women" would meet their atrocities in kind. She was at no other time in her life found lacking in the gentleness and peaceful character of woman; this deed was the product of maddening experience. Mr. Duston, who first tried unsuccessfully to induce Hannah to let him carry her to a place of safety when he saw the savages approaching, bent his energies to the saving of their nine children; and by keeping them running and firing back at the pursuing Indians, managed to get them all to a place of safety.

  5.   Hannah Emerson Duston, in Find A Grave.

    She may well have been buried in Pentucket Cemetery, but there is no record and no surviving headstone. She may as easily have been buried in a family plot on the farm of one of her sons or sons-in-law.--jaques1724 (a descendant). 22:19, 4 December 2012 (EST).