Person:Frederick Johnson (39)

Watchers
Frederick Johnson
d.Bet 1850 and 1938
  1. Robert JohnsonBet 1827 & 1830 - Bet 1880 & 1930
  2. Nicholas Johnson1838 - Bet 1880 & 1938
  3. Frederick Johnson1838 - Bet 1850 & 1938
  4. Abel Johnson1840 - Bet 1864 & 1914
  5. Foster Johnson1846 - Bet 1870 & 1946
  6. Samuel Johnson1850 - Bet 1860 & 1950
  7. Doctor Johnson1851 - Bet 1887 & 1951
  8. Charles Johnson1852 - Bet 1860 & 1952
  9. Mary Johnson1855 - Bet 1860 & 1955
Facts and Events
Name Frederick Johnson
Gender Male
Birth[1] 1838 Virginia, United States
Census[1] 1850 Union, Miami, Ohio, United States
Death? Bet 1850 and 1938
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 .

    Name: Abel Johnson
    Sex: Male
    Age: 47
    Event Date: 1850
    Event Place: Union MM, Miami, Ohio, United States
    Event Place (Original): Union, Miami, Ohio, United States
    Birth Year (Estimated): 1803
    Birthplace: Louisiana
    Race: Black
    Event Type: Census
    Household Identifier: 2302
    House Number: 2299
    Line Number: 17
    Schedule Type: 1850 Population
    Affiliate Film Number: 711
    Affiliate Publication Number: M432
    Affiliate Name: The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)

    Household Role Sex Age Birthplace
    Anna Johnson F 39 Louisiana
    Robert Johnson M 23 Louisiana
    Elizabeth Johnson F 20 Louisiana
    Thomas Johnson M 18 Louisiana
    Lettetia Johnson F 17 Louisiana
    Peter Johnson M 14 Louisiana
    Frederick Johnson M 12 Louisiana
    Nicholas Johnson M 11 Louisiana
    Charley Johnson M 10 Louisiana
    Abel Johnson M 6 Ohio
    Foster Johnson M 2 Ohio
    Charles Johnson M 2 Ohio

    Digital Folder Number: 004204496
    Microfilm Number: 444704
    Image Number: 00569
    Indexing Batch: N01124-5

    Citing this Record
    "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXQR-3HT : 21 December 2020), Abel Johnson, Union MM, Miami, Ohio, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).

    I THINK THAT ALL OF THESE LOUISIANA REPORTS SHOULD BE VIRGINIA INSTEAD. (LA VS. VA).
    I THINK THIS FAMILY IS PART OF THE RANDOLPH FREEDMEN. https://www.werelate.org/wiki/Randolph_Slaves_Research_Guide