Person:Adam Zehring (1)

Name: Elizabeth Bentley
Titles and Terms:
Event Type: Death
Event Date: 27 Jun 1916
Event Place: Dayton, Montgomery Co., Ohio
Residence Place:
Address:
Gender: Female
Age: 101
Marital Status: Widowed
Race: w
Occupation: Housework
Birth Date: 22 Jul 1814
Birthplace: Penn.
Birth Year (Estimated): 1815
Burial Date: 30 Jun 1916
Burial Place: Casline, Ohio
Cemetery:
Father's Name: Adam Zehring
Father's Titles and Terms:
Father's Birthplace: Germany
Mother's Name:
Mother's Titles and Terms:
Mother's Birthplace: Germany
Spouse's Name:
Spouse's Titles and Terms:
File Number: fn 39307
GS Film number: 1983749
Digital Folder Number: 004021407
Image Number: 02141



Citing this Record:
"Ohio Deaths, 1908-1953," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X8NK-SX7 : accessed 19 March 2016), Elizabeth Bentley, 27 Jun 1916; citing Dayton, Montgomery Co., Ohio, reference fn 39307; FHL microfilm 1,983,749.

A. C. Zehring was a Dayton councilman in 1869. Is he any connection to Adam Zehring?

Maybe?
U.S. Federal Census Non-Population Schedules, 1850-1880
Name: Adam Zatsring
Location: Harrison, Montgomery, Ohio
Enumeration Date: 15 Jul 1850
Schedule Type: Agriculture
Line Number: 31
Source Citation: Census Year: 1850; Census Place: Harrison, Montgomery, Ohio

Not found in Montgomery County Ohio Naturalization records 1803-1931. Was he naturalized in PA? Was he naturalized at all?

Not found in Montgomery County Ohio wills 1803-1918

Lawsuit over the estate of Adam Sayring:

The State of Ohio Preble County SS
Proceeding held before the Probate Court within and for
the County of Preble and State of Ohio held in the Court
House of Eaton O By the Honorable George W Gaus sitting sole Judge
of said court on the 2nd day of December AD 1861
Jacob Sayring and
Isaac Bentley Plaintiffs
Against In Probate Court
Joseph Sayring Exor
Of Adam Sayring dec'd
Be it remembered that here-
tofore ??? on the 8th day of November in the year of our
Lord one thousand Eight hundred and sixty one then
was filed in the office of the Probate Court one petition
based in the words and figures following to wit: The
above named plaintiffs say that the said Adam Sayring
deceased, died in said County on or about the -- day of
AD 1861 leaving Jacob Sayring, Elizabeth Bently wife of
the said Isaac Bentley and Joseph Sayring as his only
heirs and legal representatives, that soon after the death
of said Adam Sayring the said Joseph Sayring presented
in this Probate Court of said county what he claimed
to be the last will and testament of the said Adam
Sayring deceased and procured the same to be probated
on the 30th day of April AD 1861 and took upon himself
the trust of executor of said will, that at the time of
said defendant took upon himself said trust he falsely
and fraudulently represented to said court that the
amount of personal property belonging to said estate
which would come into his hands as such executor
would not exceed the value of two hundred dollars and
gave bond for the faithful discharge of his trust in
the sum of Four Hundred dollars with William M
Forible and George W. Foible as sureties in the service, when
in fact the personal assets belonging to said Estate there
in the hands of said Executor would amount to not
less than two thousand dollars and which personal
assets have never been accounted for by said executor.
That since the said Joseph Sayring has accepted said
Trust he has by deed conveyed his Real Estate to one
John Shaffer who has conveyed the same to his wife of
said Joseph Sayring for the purpose of placing the
same out of the reach of persons interested in the faith-
ful discharge of said trust. We the plaintiffs believe
that a suit is now pending in the court of common
pleas of Preble County to infer the specific performance
of an agreement made by the heirs of the said Adam
Sayring deceased concerning the settlement of said
estate and the ??deossion?? of the assets of the same and
that it may be of great importance to the plaintiffs
that a bond for the full amount required by law be
given by the said executor. Your petitioners therefore
pray that a writ of citation may issue against
the said Joseph Sayring Executor as aforesaid compelling
him to show cause why said bond should not be
increased so as to cover double the amount of assets
in his hands as such. Executor Reamis and Abbott
attorney for the plaintiffs, The State of Ohio, Preble County
to the said Jacob Sayring being duly sworn says
that he believes the statements of the foregoing petition
to be true. Jacob S. Sayring aforesaid to such ??? before me
this 8th day November AD 1861. (George W. Gaus Pro Judge)
----page----
In as much as ?? ?? which is the following ??? for summons.
Issue a citation to the defendants in this action returnable on the
22nd day of November AD 1861 for the defendant to appear
and show cause why his bond as the executor of the estate of
Adam Sayring deceased should not be increased and add
additional security given on the same. To the Probate Judge of
Preble County Ohio November 13th 1861. Reamis And Abbott
Attorneys. And afterwards trust on the 13th day of November
AD 1861 the following citation was issued out of said court
To wit: The State of Ohio Preble county F. To the Sheriff of
Preble County, Greeting: You are commanded that you summon
Joseph Zehring to appear before the Judge of the Probate
Court of said county at the court house in Eaton Ohio on
the 22nd day of November 1861 at 10 O'clock am to answer
a petition to show cause why his bond should not be increase-
ed and additional security given exhibited against him by
Jacob Zehring and Isaac Bentley. And this he shall in
no wise omit under the penalty of one thousand dollars and
have you then show this writ. Witness my hand and the
seal of said court at Eaton this 13th day of November AD
1861. George W. Gaus Probate Judge (seal) ???? upon which
in the following ??? Personally by certified
Copy on the 13th day of November 1861. J.R.MCliaf Sheriff
and afterwards on the 2nd day of December in
the year of our Lord one thousand Eight hundred
and sixty-one this cause this day comes as to be heard
upon the petition filed with the testimony of sort, iusses
and being argued by counsel and the court being fully
advised in the evidence find that there is not sufficient
grounds to compel said executor to increase his bond.
It is ordered and adjudged that said plaintiffs
pay the said cost of this suit taxed $ and in default
thereof that execution ??? for the ???? ?????
Signed GW Gaus Probate Judge