Person:Zephaniah Coffin (1)

Watchers
m. 21 Nov 1693
  1. Shubael Coffin1694 -
  2. Zephaniah Coffin1699 - 1774
  3. Mary Coffin1705 -
  4. Hephzibah Coffin1708 -
  5. Dinah Coffin1713 - 1793
  6. Hezekiah Coffin
  • HZephaniah Coffin1699 - 1774
  • WMiriam Macy1708 - 1736
m. 10 Nov 1725
  1. Hepzibah Coffin1726 -
  2. Stephen Coffin1730/31 -
  3. Dinah Coffin1736 -
m. 6 Oct 1737
  1. Mary Coffin1738 -
  2. Miriam Coffin1740 -
  3. Paul Coffin1742 -
  4. Zephaniah Coffin1747 -
  5. Solomon Coffin1750/51 - 1834
  6. Abigail Coffin1752 -
Facts and Events
Name Zephaniah Coffin
Gender Male
Birth[1] 28 Oct 1699 Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 10 Nov 1725 Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United Statesto Miriam Macy
Marriage 6 Oct 1737 Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United Statesto Abigail Coleman
Death[2] 12 Oct 1774 Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Nantucket, Massachusetts to the year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1925-1928)
    1:344.

    Coffin, Zephaniah, s. Stephen Jr. [dup omits Jr.], 28th, 8 mo. 1699. [h. Miriam (d. John Macy Jr. and Judith), h. Abigail (d. Solomon Coleman and Mary), s. Stephen Jr. and Experience (Look), 28th, 10 mo., PR38.]
    [In 1699, the 8th month was October. When PR38 (genealogical records of William C. Folger) were compiled in 1800s, October was the 10th month, so both sources appear to say October.]

  2. Nantucket, Nantucket, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Nantucket, Massachusetts to the year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1925-1928)
    5:191.

    Coffin, Zepheniah, h. Miriam, h. Abigail, 12th 10 mo. 1774, CR4. [Zephaniah, h. Miriam (Macy), h. Abigail (Coleman), s. Stephen Jr. and Experience (Look), 10th, 12 mo., PR38. Zephaniah, 10th, 12 mo., PR63.]
    [Day and months appear to be interchanged. Vital record used based on the assumption is was more contemporaneous whereas the other records were copies, giving extra opportunities to introduce this error?]