Person:William Tulloch (73)

Watchers
  1. Mary Tulloch1818 - 1886
  2. William Tulloch1819 - 1887
  3. John Tulloch1822 - 1892
  4. Thomas Tulloch1824 -
  5. Robert Tulloch1826 - 1895
  6. Martin Tulloch1829 - 1914
Facts and Events
Name[1][2][3] William Tulloch
Gender Male
Birth[4][6] 18 Nov 1819 North Ronaldshay, Orkney, Scotland
Christening[4] 20 Feb 1820 North Ronaldshay, Orkney, Scotland
Census[2] 1841 Southness, North Ronaldshay, Orkney, ScotlandAge: 20
Census[5] 1851 Southness, North Ronaldshay, Orkney, ScotlandAge:30 Rel:Head Occ:Farmer 3 Acrs 3 Pastr 3 Labs 
Census[1] 1861 Southness, North Ronaldshay, Orkney, ScotlandAge: 40Relationship: Head
Census[3] 1871 Southness, North Ronaldshay, Orkney, ScotlandAge: 50Relationship: Head
Death? 16 Aug 1887 Southness, North Ronaldshay, Orkney, Scotland
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1861 Scotland Census. (Ancestry.com. 1861 Scotland Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006.)
    Parish: North Ronaldshay; ED: 2; Page: 2; Line: 16; Roll: CSSCT1861_3.

    _APID: 1,1080::2123495

  2. 2.0 2.1 1841 Scotland Census. (Ancestry.com. 1841 Scotland Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006.)
    Parish: North Ronaldsay; ED: 2; Page: 7; Line: 1026; Year: 1841.

    _APID: 1,1004::1379949

  3. 3.0 3.1 1871 Scotland Census. (Ancestry.com. 1871 Scotland Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007.)
    Parish: North Ronaldshay; ED: 2; Page: 7; Line: 3; Roll: CSSCT1871_5.

    _APID: 1,1104::1177825

  4. 4.0 4.1 United Kingdom. FreeREG Parish Register Transcripts and Indexes. (Free UK Genealogy).
  5. General Register Office for Scotland. 1851 Scotland Census. (Edinburgh).

    Piece: SCT1851/22 Place: North Ronaldshay -Orkney Enumeration District: 2
    Civil Parish: North Ronaldshay Ecclesiastical Parish, Village or Island: North Ronaldshay
    Folio: 12 Page: 10 Schedule: 22
    Address: Ness, Southness

  6. Entered in register as "18 Nov 1820" but this predates the christening. Given that the christening date is consistent with the register date, it is assumed that the date of birth should be the previous year. This is also more consistent with his age at death, given as 68.