Person:William Eaton (39)

Watchers
m. Bef 1764
  1. Alpheus Eaton1764 -
  2. William Eaton1766 - 1859
  3. Sarah Eaton1769 -
  4. Mary Eaton1771 -
  5. Amherst Eaton1773 -
  6. Thomas Eaton1776 -
  7. Russell Eaton1779 - Bef 1786
  8. Nathaniel Eaton1781 -
  9. Russell Eaton1786 -
  • HWilliam Eaton1766 - 1859
  • WAnna Gates1767 -
m. 28 Feb 1788
  1. William Eaton1788 - 1860
  2. Mary Eaton1790 -
  3. Russell Eaton1791 - 1850
  4. Anna Eaton1792 -
m. 14 Jun 1795
  1. David Eaton1795 -
  2. John Eaton1797 - 1827
  3. Sarah Chadwick Eaton1800 - 1887
  4. Augustine Eaton1802 -
  5. Lydia Wait Eaton1808 - 1830
  6. Joseph Chadwick Eaton1810 - 1835
Facts and Events
Name[3] William Eaton
Gender Male
Birth[1] 10 Sep 1766 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 28 Feb 1788 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Anna Gates
Marriage 14 Jun 1795 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Hannah Chadwick
Death[2][4] 4 May 1859 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Rice, Franklin P. Worcester Births, Marriages, and Deaths. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Worcester Society of Antiquity, 1894)
    p. 82.

    EATON, William, s. of Thomas and Susanah, [born] Sept. 10, 1766.

  2. Massachusetts, United States. Massachusetts Deaths, 1841-1915
    [1].

    Deaths registered in the City of Worcester for the year, 1859.
    No.: 177
    Date of Death: May 4. [1859]
    Name: William Eaton
    Age: 92 y. 7 m. 24 d. [birth calculates to about 10 Sep 1766]
    Place of Death: Worcester
    Sex and Condition: M Wid'r
    Occupation: Shoemaker
    Place of Birth: Worcester
    Parents: Thomas & Susan Eaton
    Cause: Old Age

  3. Chase, Charles A. "The Baldwin-Eaton Estate", in Worcester Society of Antiquity (Massachusetts). Proceedings of the Worcester Society of Antiquity. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Photocopied by the Genealogical Society of Utah, 1985-1986)
    Vol. 21, p. 104.

    "Mr. Eaton is well remembered by some of the present members of this Society. His father, Thomas Eaton, came here from Sudbury and married Susan Rice, whose father was the first white child born in Worcester. He married first Anna Gates, daughter of William Gates, and second Hannah Chadwick, daughter of David Chadwick. He served on the Board of Selectmen for twelve years, was Representative to the General Court for ten years, and was County Commissioner as well as a deputy sheriff. 'All the duties of these various offices,' said Hon. Isaac Davis, 'he discharged with kindness and abibilty. He was a man of strict integrity, upright and honorable in all business transactions, and commanded the respect and esteem of all who have the pleasure of his acquaintance.' He was born Sept. 10, 1766, and died May 4, 1859."

  4. Massachusetts. Probate Court (Worcester County). Probate records 1731-1916, index 1731-1881. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1971, 2001)
    Case 18666: Eaton William, Worcester, 1859.

    Will of William Eaton of Worcester ... Esquire, dated 7 Dec 1854, proved 5 Jul 1859, names son William Eaton; children of my son Russell Eaton, son Augustin Eaton, daughter Ana Gleason; my two grand Daughters Mary Gleason & Sarah E Gleason; daughter Sally C Eaton, she to be sole executrix.
    29 Sep 1856: Codicil, having deeded estate to daughter Anna and granddaughters Mary E Gleason and Sarah E Gleason, so voids legacies to them in will.
    14 Sep 1857: Codicil, modifies legacy to children of Russell Eaton.
    7 Jun 1859: Heirs cited to appear to consider proving of will.
    27 Jun 1903: Memorandum of Sarah A. Gates of Worcester, one of the children of Russell Eaton, that she believes all legacies were paid, that all other heirs (Sallie C. Eaton, sons William, Russell and Augustin Eaton, daughter Anna Gleason and granddaughters Mary Gleason and Sarah E. Gleason) are all deceased.

  5.   Source:Molyneux, Nellie Zada Rice. History, Genealogical and Biographical of the Eaton Families, p. 201, appears, between typos and confusing text, to attribute the marriage to Anna Gates and Hannah Chadwick to a different William Eaton. But on p. 163, it attributes them to the right William Eaton. Great confusion is caused by a strange numbering system, but clearly this source has confused two people, and appears to be completely uncredible.