Person:William Bond (112)

Watchers
Browse
m. 2 Jun 1680
  1. Margeret Bond1681 -
  2. William Bond1683 - Bef 1684
  3. William Bond1684 - 1684/85
  4. Deliverance Bond1686 -
  5. Thomas Bond1687/88 - 1687/88
  6. Mary BondAbt 1690 - 1748
  7. Elizabeth Bond1691 - 1715/16
  8. William Bond1695 -
  9. Jonathan Bond1696 -
  10. Hephzibah Bond1699 -
  11. Nathaniell Bond1701 -
Facts and Events
Name[3] William Bond
Gender Male
Birth[1] 28 Oct 1684 Watertown, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Death[2] 23 Mar 1684/85 Watertown, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Historical Society of Watertown (Massachusetts). Watertown Records. (Watertown, Mass.: Press of Fred Barker, 1894-1939)
    Vol. 1, p. 55.

    [97] 1684.
    Willyam Bond, son of Willyam and Hephzibaph - borne the 28 of October

  2. Historical Society of Watertown (Massachusetts). Watertown Records. (Watertown, Mass.: Press of Fred Barker, 1894-1939)
    Vol. 1, p. 56.

    [99] 1685.
    William Bond son of William & Hebhziba dyed the 23 of March.
    [Also, p. 1:57: William Bond son of Willyam and Hephzibah dyed the 22 of March. 85. Note: the first record being written first, was probably recorded closer to the actual event, so presumed more likely to be correct.]

  3. Bond, Henry, M.D. Family Memorials. Genealogies of the Families and Descendants of the Early Settlers of Watertown, Massachusetts, Including Waltham and Weston (1855): To Which Is Appended the Early History of the Town. With Illustrations, Maps and Notes. (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, and Company, 1855)
    p. 48.

    Children of Dea. William Bond and Hepzibah Hastings: 3) William, b. 28 Oct 1684, "d. next March, of a fall into a well".
    [Note: there is ambiguity in the death records, as 23 Mar 1685 could be 1684/5 or 1685/6. Bond says here "next March", which would be 1684/5, and having no further information, that was followed. However, at 4 months, an infant probably wouldn't even be crawling, suggesting either the 1685/6 interpretation is correct, or else that he fell from where he was placed, as opposed to the stumbling of a toddler...]