Person:Wiley Coker (1)

Watchers
John Wiley Thompson Coker
m. 17 Aug 1874
  1. Robert Sanford Coker1875 - 1946
  2. James Wesley Coker1878 - 1955
  3. John Wiley Thompson Coker1879 - 1961
  4. Carrie Coker1882 -
  5. Maggie Coker1884 -
  6. Louis E. Coker1890 -
m. 10 Apr 1898
Facts and Events
Name[1][2][3] John Wiley Thompson Coker
Gender Male
Birth[1][3][4] 10 Dec 1879 Comanche, Texas, United States
Census[1] 13 Jun 1880 Comanche, Texas, United StatesWiley Coker in household of John Coker, son, age 6/12, born in Dec in Ga, father born in Ga, mother born in Ga
Marriage 10 Apr 1898 Comanche, Texas, United StatesW. T. Coker to Mattie May
to Martha Jane May
Census[3] 23 Jun 1900 Comanche, Texas, United StatesW T Coker, head, farmer, owns farm, married 3 years, age 19, born Dec 1880 in Texas, father and mother born in Georgia
Death? 10 Oct 1961 Eastland, Texas, United States

Name: John Wiley Thompson Coker

Death date: 10 Oct 1961

Death place: Eastland, Texas

Birth date: 10 Dec 1879

Birth place: Comanche Co., Texas

Age at death: 81 years

Gender: Male

Marital status: Widowed

Race or color: White

Spouse name:

Father name: John W. Coker

Mother name: Frances Redwine

Digital GS number: 4166599

Image number: 3164

Collection: Texas Deaths, 1890-1976

From: [1]

References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 United States, Texas, Comanche, census, 1880. (citing National Archives microfilm T9, roll 1297)
    page 150 C (stamped), 13 June 1880.

    SD 4, ED 33, dwelling #179, family #184

  2. State of Texas; Jordan R. Dodd; Liahona Research; and Hunting For Bears. Texas Marriage Collection, 1814-1909 and 1966-2002
    10 Apr 1898.

    W. T. Coker to Mattie May, Comanche County, TX

  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Comanche, Texas, United States. 1900 U.S. Census Population Schedule
    page 208 A (stamped), 23 Jun 1900.

    Justice Precinct 5, NARA microfilm publication T623, roll 1623, SD 4, ED 32, dwelling #364, family #375, W. T. Coker; digital image. Ancestry.com. (www.ancestry.com)

  4. Birth date of Dec 1880 is not correct; if it were Wiley Coker would not have been enumerated in the 1880 census.