Person:Thomas Thurston (12)

Watchers
m. 13 Dec 1655
  1. Thomas Thurston1657/58 - 1704
  2. Sarah Thurston1662 - 1688
m. 23 Jul 1685
  1. Mehitable Thurston1686 - 1769
  2. Mary Thurston1688 - 1688
  3. Thomas Thurston1689 - Bef 1755
  4. Ichabod Thurston1692 - 1692
  • HThomas Thurston1657/58 - 1704
  • WEsther Clark1669/70 - 1713
m. Bef 1695
  1. David Thurston1693 -
  2. Daniel Thurston1695 - 1737/38
  3. Luke Thurston1698 -
  4. Esther Thurston1700 -
  5. Mary Thurston1702 - 1754
  6. Paul Thurston1704 -
Facts and Events
Name[3] Thomas Thurston
Gender Male
Birth[1][4] 11 Feb 1657/58 Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 23 Jul 1685 Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Mehitabel Mason
Marriage Bef 1695 probably Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United StatesBased on birth of eldest known child
to Esther Clark
Death[2] 15 Dec 1704 Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Medfield, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1903)
    p. 97.

    THURSTONE, [torn]homas, s. Thomas and Sarah, [born] Feb. 11, 1657-8.

  2. "Deaths in Wrentham 1673 to 1704", in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    Vol. 3, p. 31.

    [Note: annotation says "Copied from the Records", but the following item did not seem to make it into the published records. Whether the compilers of the published records assumed it was a duplicate of his father's death, or did not have access to this set of records, is unknown.]
    Thomas Thurston died Dec 15 1704.

  3. Thurston, Brown. Thurston Genealogies, 1635-1892: Second Edition. (Portland, Me.: Brown Thurston, 1892)
    p. 362.

    Thomas Thurston [#5554], s/o Thomas Thurston [#5541, p. 358] and Sarah Thaxter, b. 11 Feb 1658, d. 15 Dec 1704, m. (1) 3 Jul 1685 Mehitable Mason, m. (2) Esther "(probably Clark)".

  4. The Thurston Genealogy says the Boston record gives his birth as "11 Dec" instead of 11 Feb 1658. One would assume this means 11 Dec 1657, and that "Dec" is an error interpreting the 12th month. But there is more to it. As published in NEHGR, p. 13:218, "Boston Records", "More Berthes of Meadfeild", the Boston record says "11 : 12 : 58", which should be interpreted as 11 Feb 1658/59, which refers to a date exactly one year later than what the published Medfield record says.