Person:Seth Wilder (1)

Watchers
m. 30 Jul 1723
  1. Ephraim Wilder1723/24 -
  2. Lydia Wilder1725 - 1812
  3. John Wilder1727 - 1786
  4. David Wilder1728/29 -
  5. Mary Wilder1731 - 1731
  6. Mary Wilder1732 - Bef 1770
  7. Hannah Wilder1734 - 1756
  8. Abel Wilder1736 - 1756
  9. Seth Wilder1738/39 - 1813
  10. Child Wilder1742/43 - 1742/43
  • HSeth Wilder1738/39 - 1813
  • W.  Miriam Beal (add)
m. 27 Jun 1761
Facts and Events
Name Seth Wilder
Gender Male
Birth[1][2] 3 Feb 1738/39 Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 27 Jun 1761 Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United Statesto Miriam Beal (add)
Death[3] 15 Apr 1813 Cummington, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Hingham, Massachusetts, ca. 1639-1844. (New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    115.

    Seth s of Ephraim Wilder & Mary B Feb 3 1739

  2. Lincoln, George; Thomas T. Bouve; Edward T. Bouve; John D. Long; Walter L. Bouve; Francis H. Lincoln; Edmund Hersey; Fearing Burr; Charles W. S Seymour; and Town of Hingham. History of the Town of Hingham, Massachusetts . (Hingham, Massachusetts: The Town, 1893)
    3:316.

    Seth Wilder, s/o Ephraim, b. Hingham 3 Feb 1738-9, m. 27 Aug 1761 Miriam Beal. Moved aft. 1771 to Cummington (birth of son Abel 19 Oct 1771)

  3. Harrell, Mrs. Evans. "Seth Wilder and Miriam Beale", in The American Genealogist (TAG). (Donald Lines Jacobus, et.al.)
    43:83.

    Seth Sr. d. 15 Apr 1813, one day after his will was written mentioning deceased son Seth who is said to have died 8 Oct 1810.
    [Note: Source:Cummington, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Cummington, Massachusetts, 1762-1900, p. 242, says Wilder, Seth, d. Oct. 8, 1810 [Oct. 8, 1814, age 74, P.R. 1]. The basic record could be either father or son, and it corresponds to what is given for the son. The second source, PR1, gives an age at death that could only be the father. However, the coincidence of the father and son both dying on Oct. 8 is highly unlikely, and given the TAG article, it seems more likely this used the son's death date, but adjusted it to occur after the father's will. More sources would be useful.]