BURNHAM, Nathan, s. Nath[anie]ll and Eunice, [born] Sept. 19, 1700. BURNHAM, Nathan, s. Nathaniel and Unice, [born] Sept. 19, 1701.
↑ Contrary to what is said Source:Massachusetts Magazine : A Quarterly Magazine Devoted to Massachusetts History, Genealogy, and Biography, Vol. 4, p. 189-190, these two records are probably not the births of Nathaniel and Nathan. Rather is it probably two copies of Nathaniel's birth. Which one is correct is anybody's guess, though based on the births of the parents around 1670, probably the earlier one? Nathan did not marry until 1745 and had a child as late as 1761 which strongly suggests he was likely the youngest child in this family.