Person:Nathaniel Burnham (4)

Watchers
Nathaniel Burnham
 
m. 1700
  1. Nathaniel Burnham1700 -
  2. Eunice Burnam1703 -
  3. Phebe Burnham1705 - Aft 1770
  4. Sarah Burnham1712 -
  5. Nathan BurnhamAbt 1715 -
  • HNathaniel Burnham1700 -
  • W.  Ruth Smith (add)
m. 1 Jan 1729
  1. Nathaniel Burnham1730 -
  2. Reuben Burnham1732/33 -
  3. Eunice Burnham1735 -
  4. Simeon Burnham1739 -
  5. Elizabeth Burnham1741 - Bef 1749
  6. Benjamin Burnham1744 -
  7. Phebe Burnham1746 - Bef 1749
  8. Lemuel Burnham1748 -
Facts and Events
Name Nathaniel Burnham
Gender Male
Birth[1][2] 19 Sep 1700 Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 1 Jan 1729 Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Ruth Smith (add)
References
  1. Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Ipswich, Massachusetts to End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1910, 1919)
    Vol. 1, p. 63.

    BURNHAM, Nathan, s. Nath[anie]ll and Eunice, [born] Sept. 19, 1700.
    BURNHAM, Nathan, s. Nathaniel and Unice, [born] Sept. 19, 1701.

  2. Contrary to what is said Source:Massachusetts Magazine : A Quarterly Magazine Devoted to Massachusetts History, Genealogy, and Biography, Vol. 4, p. 189-190, these two records are probably not the births of Nathaniel and Nathan. Rather is it probably two copies of Nathaniel's birth. Which one is correct is anybody's guess, though based on the births of the parents around 1670, probably the earlier one? Nathan did not marry until 1745 and had a child as late as 1761 which strongly suggests he was likely the youngest child in this family.