Person:Mary Lovett (6)

m. Bet 1644 and 1645
  1. James Lovett1648 - 1718
  2. Mary Lovett1651 - 1732
  3. Martha Lovett1654 - 1749/50
  4. Hannah Lovett1656 - 1715
m. 20 Jan 1668/69
  1. Mary Tyler1669/70 - Bet 1728 & 1733
  2. Hannah TylerEst 1674 - 1717
  3. Martha Tyler1676 - 1741
  4. John Tyler1677 - 1705
  5. Daniel TylerEst 1679 -
  6. Joanna Tyler1681 - Bef 1728
  7. James Tyler1683 - 1754
  8. Hopestill Tyler1685 - 1762
  9. Mehitable Tyler1687/88 -
  10. Abigail Tyler1687/88 - 1771
Facts and Events
Name Mary Lovett
Gender Female
Birth[1][2][3] 1 Sep 1651 Braintree, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
Alt Birth[2][3][5] 7 Mar 1651/52 Braintree, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 20 Jan 1668/69 Mendon, Worcester County, Massachusetts, USAto Hopestill Tyler
Death[1][4] 3 Mar 1732 Preston, New London, Connecticut, United States
Ancestral File Number 8TSJ-P9
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 Brigham, Willard Irving Tyler, and Calvin Cedric Tyler. The Tyler Genealogy: The Descendants of Job Tyler of Andover, Massachusetts, 1619-1700. (Plainfield, New Jersey and Tylerville, Connecticut (Vols. 1 & 2); Grand Rapids, Michigan (Vol. 3): Cornelius B. Tyler and Rollin U. Tyler (Vols. 1 & 2); Calvin Cedric Tyler (Vol. 3), 1912, 1976)
    1:25-26.

    'HOPESTILL TYLER ... married in Mendon, January 20, 1668, Mary Lovett, born in Mendon, March 7, 1652-53; said to have died in 1732; daughter of Daniel Lovett, of Braintree and Mendon.'

    See this source for information on her trial for witchcraft, of which she was pressured to confess, but ultimately acquitted.

  2. 2.0 2.1 Savage, James. A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England: Showing Three Generations of Those Who Came Before May, 1692, on the Basis of Farmer's Register. (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1860-1862)
    3:124.

    'Lovett, ... Daniel, Braintree 1662, ... but at B. had, prob. all his ch. ... Mary, 7 Mar. 1652; ...'

  3. 3.0 3.1 Bates, Samuel. Records of the Town of Braintree, 1640 to 1793. (Randolph, Massachusetts : D.H. Huxford, 1886)
    page 631.

    'Mary Lovitt, the daughter of Daniel Lovitt and Johanna his wiffe was borne the 1 mo. 7th, 1651.'

    With two exceptions, the records for the earliest years (1643-1655) are written as day, month, year (e.g., '(16) (5th) 1646'), or are ambiguous (e.g, '5, mo. 7'). Although it would seem natural to associate 'mo.' with the first number in a format such as '5th mo. 8th', there is at least one record (on page 635) in which it is clearly associated with the second number: '(15)th. mo. (8th.) 1653'. Therefore, I have chosen to interpret all the early ambiguous dates as day, month, year, even though Savage did not always do so.

  4. Connecticut, United States. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records
    Preston Vital Records:243.

    'TYLER, TILER, ...
    Mary, d. Mar. 3, 1732'

  5. The alternate birth date is based on reading the Vital Record as the 1st month, 7th day, and assuming that the year is 1651/52, as Savage did. See note on the Vital Record citation indicating why the correct interpretation may be 1st day, 7th month.

    Note also that Mary was only 17 when she married (if born Sep 1651), and would have been not quite 17 if she was born Mar 1651/52.