Person:Jonathan Green (8)

Watchers
m. Abt 1666
  1. Samuel Green1667/68 - Bef 1758
  2. Thomas GreenAbt 1669 - 1725
  3. John Green1672 - Bef 1716
  4. William Green1674 -
  5. Mary GreenAbt 1677 - 1761
  6. Jonathan GreenCal 1679/80 - 1744
  7. Martha GreenCal 1683 - 1754
  8. David GreenAbt 1685 - 1754
  9. Elizabeth Green1687 -
  10. Isaac Green1690 - 1765
Facts and Events
Name[3] Jonathan Green
Gender Male
Birth[2][3] Cal 2 Feb 1679/80 Malden, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Alt Birth[1] Cal 2 Apr 1680 Malden, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Death[1] 21 Jul 1744 Stoneham, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 Stoneham, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Stoneham, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1918)
    p. 171.

    GREEN, Jonathan, [Ens. GR1], July 21, 1744. [a. 64 y. 3 m. 19 d. GR1]
    [Note: birth calculates to about 2 Apr 1680. But compare to NEHGR citation. Note: gravestone not readable on Find A Grave and memorial page cites this source for age at death, so probably not an independent source.]

  2. "Inscriptions in Stoneham Cemetery", in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    Vol. 12, p. 309.

    Here Lyes Buried ye Body of Enign Jonathan Green, who departed this life July 21st Anno Dom. 1744, aged 64 years, 5 months, & 19 days.

  3. 3.0 3.1 Greene, Samuel S. (Samuel Stillman). A genealogical sketch of the descendants of Thomas Green[e] of Malden Mass. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1968)
    p. 19.

    Jonathan Green, s/o Samuel Green and Mary Cook, b. Malden 2 Feb 1679-80, d. 21 Jul 1744, "a. 64 years, 5 months, and 19 days", m. 15 Nov 1715 Lydia Bucknam.
    [Note: the NEGHR article above was published in Oct. 1858 by John Vinton, author of Source:Vinton, John Adams. Vinton Memorial, Comprising a Genealogy of the Descendants of John Vinton of Lynn, 1648, and a note there indicates that he relied on and collaborated with the author of this source. The wording of the two souces is almost identical. So this source probably relied on Vinton's transcription of the gravestone and does not appear to represent an independent reading of the gravestone.]