Person:John Bancroft (18)

Watchers
m. 24 Apr 1740
  1. Eunice Bancroft1741 -
  2. David Bancroft1743 -
  3. Jonas Bancroft1744 -
  4. John Bancroft1746 - 1809
  5. Ebenezer Bancroft1748 - 1814
  6. Jonathan Bancroft1750 -
  7. Mary Bancroft1752 - 1828
  8. Ruth Bancroft1754 -
  9. Hannah Bancroft1756 -
  10. Nathaniel Bancroft1758 -
  11. Timothy Bancroft1760 -
m. 17 Nov 1768
  1. Molly Bancroft1769 -
  2. John Bancroft1771 -
  3. Samuel Bancroft1774 -
  4. Nathaniel Bancroft1777 -
Facts and Events
Name John Bancroft
Gender Male
Birth[1][2][3] 10 Dec 1746 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 17 Nov 1768 Groton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Eunice Blood
Death[2] 20 Nov 1809 Chittenden, Rutland, Vermont, United States
References
  1. Rice, Franklin P. Worcester Births, Marriages, and Deaths. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Worcester Society of Antiquity, 1894)
    p. 16.

    BANCROFT, John, s. of David and Eunice, [born] Dec. 10, 1745-6.
    [Note: one would suspect this means 10 Dec 1745, i.e., the winter of 1745-6. Age at death, 63, on 20 Nov 1809, says born before 20 Nov 1746, which also suggests 10 Dec 1745 is correct. 10 Dec 1746 is suggested by the spacing of his siblings' births.]

  2. 2.0 2.1 Find A Grave: Barnard Cemetery, Chittenden, VT, in Find A Grave
    John Bancroft.

    [Note: No image. Inscription claimed to be:
    Here lies the body of Mr. John Bancroft who died Nov. 20, 1809 Age 63 years.
    citing Source:Jenks, Margaret R. Chittenden, Mendon, Pittsford and Sherburne Cemetery Inscriptions, Rutland County, Vermont.]

  3. Allen, John Kermott. "Thomas Bancroft of Dedham and Reading, Mass., and Some of His Descendants", in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    Vol. 95, p. 67.

    John Bancroft [#40], s/o David Bancroft [#17, p. 94:316, and 1st wife Eunice Bancroft], b. Worcester 8 Aug (or 10 Dec.), 1746, died Chittenden, Vt., 20 Nov 1809, m. Eunice Blood.
    [Note: the basis for 8 Aug is unknown. There is no discussion. See comments attached to Worcester birth record.]