Person:Ebenezer Guild (1)

m. 29 Nov 1676
  1. Samuel Guild1677 - 1750
  2. Nathaniel Guild1678/79 - 1774
  3. Mary Guild1681 -
  4. John Guild1683 - 1684
  5. Deborah Guild1685 - 1773
  6. John Guild1687 - 1767
  7. Isreal Guild1690 - Bef 1766
  8. Ebenezer Guild1692 - 1774
  9. Joseph Guild1694 - 1751
  10. Elizabeth Guild1697 -
m. 12 Oct 1714
Facts and Events
Name[1][4] Ebenezer Guild
Gender Male
Birth[1][2] 23 Jul 1692 Dedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 12 Oct 1714 Attleboro, Bristol, Massachusetts, United Statesto Abigail Daggett
Death[1][3][5] 8 Jun 1774 Attleboro, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lambert, Margaret Guild. Descendants of John Guild and Elizabeth Crooke of Dedham, Massachusetts: Circa 1636-2006. (Scarborough, ON, 2006)
    p. 16.

    Children of Samuel Guild and Mary Woodcock

  2. Dedham (Massachusetts). Town Clerk; Julius Herbert Tuttle; Benjamin Fisher; and Don Gleason Hill. The early records of the town of Dedham, Massachusetts. (Dedham, Massachusetts: Dedham Transcript Press, 1886-1936)
    p. 24.

    Ebenezer, the son of Samuel & Mary Guile, was born Jully 23, [16]92.

  3. Attleboro, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Attleborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1934)
    p. 680.

    GUILD, Ebenezer, [died] June 8, 1774, in his 82d y. PR79
    [PR79=Private record in possession of New England Historic Genealogical Society, present to them by Ira B. Peck of Woonsocket, Rhode Island, August 30, 1853.]

  4. Burleigh, Charles. The Genealogy and History of the Guild, Guile, and Gile Family. (Portland, Me.: Brown Thurston & Company, 1897)
    p. 33.

    Ebenezer Guild [#16], s/o Ebenezer Guild and Mary Woodcock, b. Dedham 23 Jul 1692, d. Attleborough 8 Jun 1774, m. 12 Oct 1714 Abigail Daggett.

  5. A Find A Grave memorial claims to be this Ebenezer, but the stone clearly belongs to the one who died in 1802 aged 79. It is possible the stone shown on the memorial for the other Ebenezer, having a slightly different shape so being a different stone, belongs to this Ebenezer, but the photo is not good enough to enable reading the inscription.