ViewsWatchersBrowse |
Family tree▼ (edit)
m. Bef 1703
(edit)
m. Aft 16 Sep 1739
Facts and Events
History of Western Massachusetts, volume 2, p. 189-90: The territory of Cummington was originally embraced in No. 5, of the series of ten townships sold by the Government at auction, on the 2d of June, 1762. ... Samuel Brewer settled within the territory [of Cummington] as early as 1761. Within a year of two after this, came Peter harwood, Joseph Farr, Daniel Reed, Joseph Warner, William Ward, and perhaps, others. There is another Capt. Daniel Reed Sr., s/o Thomas Reed and Hannah Randall, b. 1704, m. 1729 Ruth Torrey, d. 1776. Both Daniels had wives named Ruth, and both were called "Capt.", so it can be tricky sorting them out.
Besides the marriages to the two Ruths, there are two additional marriages of a Capt. Daniel Reed to Sarahs that are very hard to place, one to Sarah (Howland) Dawes in 1765, and one to Sarah Hamblin in 1776. Older genealogies, such as Jacob Whittemore Reed, did not feel it was necessary to explain their conclusions, and it is difficult to know if they were doing more than matching vital records, or if there was supporting information that informed their decisions. We can only assume the first, having no knowledge of the second. In any event, this work is known to be full of mistakes and, in this case, its incompleteness and lack of detail does not give us confidence in its conclusions. So, for the record, he says that Daniel Jr. married Sarah (Howland) Dawes, but does not mention nor attribute the marriage to Sarah Hamblin to either. He does not mention a death date for Daniel Sr. nor his wife even though both plainly appear in Abington VRs, and so never identifies who the recorded death in 1750 of Ruth, wife of Ensign Daniel Reed, applies to, nor who the death record of Capt. Daniel Reed in 1776 applies to. What we do know:
Source:Ashley, Elihu. Diary, Mar. 1, 1773 - Nov. 5, 1775, entry for 2 Jan 1775, "Captn Reads Wife of No 5, his Sons wife and Child were kill'd (in Chesterfield against Deacn Tuppers) by the falling of a Tree as they were riding in a Sley". We know this pertains to the Daniel Jr. who relocated to Cummington, which is only about 9 miles from Chesterfield, but this entry does not give the name of the wife. Some sources name her as Sarah in added notes. Since they give no justification, we can only assume they are following the Reed Family History mentioned above in thinking that his wife of this time was Sarah. However, Cummington VRs, p. 221, gives the death on 2 Jan 1775 of Ruth, w. of Daniel, Thankful, w. of Seth, and Olive, dau. of Seth and Thankful. Given Ruth's death date of 2 Jan 1775, all those sources that give this same death date to Sarah (Howland) (Dawes) Reed, would appear to have been misled by the Reed Family History into thinking she married Daniel Jr. who moved to Cummington. So, resetting based on the Cummington VRs, it now seems obvious that Sarah (Howland) Dawes married Capt. Daniel Reed, Sr. Then the Abington death record in 1792, age 89, of Sarah, widow of Capt. Daniel Reed, must be Sarah (Howland) Dawes, and it must be referring to Daniel Sr. This is an attractive arrangement because the birth date calculated from this death record is a good match with the known birth of Sarah Howland, and because pairing her with Daniel Sr. removes the oddity that Daniel Jr. married a woman 10 years older than himself. (Actually, two women 10 years older than himself, because in that original scenario, he married first Sarah (Howland) Dawes whose birth date says she is ten years older than Daniel, and then as he is the only Daniel living in 1776 to marry Sarah Hamblin, the 1792 death record would have apply to her, making her 10 years older than him, as well. In the new scenario, the older Daniel married the older Sarah (Howland) Dawes and the death date belongs to her, confirming her age. In the new scenario, we have no information about the age of Sarah Hamblin.) This new arrangement also means that Daniel Sr., father of Daniel 3rd, married the mother of his son's wife, which is not an uncommon arrangement in colonial times. Since the marriage record to Sarah Hamblin is 3 months after the Abington death of Daniel Sr., it must be Daniel Jr. that married her. It seems a little odd, since Abington is about 150 miles from Cummington (about 5 days journey one way?), but there doesn't seem to be any other explanation. Daniel 3rd's then-wife Anna lived until 1794, so it could not have been him. Daniel 3rd's son Daniel was b. 1759 and wouldn't have been of marrying age yet. Daniel Jr. had no son Daniel that we know of, so that exhausts the possibilities. There is no identification of this Sarah Hamblin, and we know nothing about her parents, whether a maiden or widow when married, how old, etc., to try and see if this is a reasonable arrangement, but coming about a year after the sleigh accident, it is natural to assume this is Daniel Jr. remarrying. It is still unknown what the marital status of Daniel Sr. was from 1750 when his first wife died, until 1765 when he married Sarah (Howland) Dawes. Did he remain unmarried, or was there another marriage in between? References
|