Person:Charles Perrine (2)

Watchers
Charles Willard Wheeler Perrine, MD
b.11 Feb 1863 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
d.Dec 1959 Pinellas, Florida, USA
Parents and Siblings
(edit)
m. 16 May 1839
  1. Charles Willard Wheeler Perrine, MD1863 - 1959
Spouse and Children
(edit)
  • H.  Charles Willard Wheeler Perrine, MD1863 - 1959
  • W.  Ida Aldrich1863 -
m. 18 May 1886
  1. Charles Willard Perrine, Jr1899 - 1986
Add another spouse & children
Facts and Events
Name[1][2][3][4][5][6] Charles Willard Wheeler Perrine, MD
Alt Name[7][8][9][3][10][11][1] Chas W. Perrine, MD
Gender Male
Birth[12][8][9][3][10][1][5][6] 11 Feb 1863 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Residence[6] 1870 Rochester Ward 2, Monroe, New York, United States
Residence[1] 1 Jun 1875 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAAge: 12; Relation to Head of House: Son
Education[13][4][14] 1883 New York, New York, New York, USABellevue Hospital Medical College, New York University
Marriage 18 May 1886 to Ida Aldrich
Occupation[14] 1890 New York, USAPhysician, Homeopathy
Occupation[2] 1891 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAPhysician
Residence[2] 1891 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Other[15][16] 1893 New York, USASued for a mortgage debt to New York Supreme Court Summary: Charles and Frank were in debt to someone named Bradley Redfield. In mid-February, Charles and Frank took out a loan from Charles' sister, Mary, for which they pledged certain property as secu Court case: Stephens vs Perrine
Residence[10] 1900 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAAge: 37; Marital Status: Married; Relation to Head of House: Head
Residence[11] 1903 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Occupation[2] 1905 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAOccupation
Residence[2] 1905 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Residence[4] 1907 New York, USA
Occupation? 1910 Physician general practice
Residence[9] 1910 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAAge: 47; Marital Status: Married; Relation to Head of House: Head
Occupation[8] 1915 Physician
Residence[8] 1 Jun 1915 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAAge: 55; Relation to Head of House: Head
Occupation[3] 1920 Doctor Medical, General Practice
Residence[3] 1920 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAAge: 57; Marital Status: Married; Relation to Head of House: Head
Residence[11] 1927 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Occupation[2] 1930 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USAPhysician
Residence[2] 1930 Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Residence[4] Rochester, Monroe, New York, USA
Residence[5] USA
Death[7] Dec 1959 Pinellas, Florida, USA

_PHOTO:

References
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 New York Secretary of State. New York State Census, 1875. (Albany, New York).
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 U.S. City Directories, 1821-1995: [database on-line]. (Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011)
    Occupation.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 United States. 1920 U.S. Census Population Schedule. (National Archives Microfilm Publication T625)
    Year: 1920; Census Place: Rochester Ward 19, Monroe, New York; Roll: T625_1125; Page: 1B; Enumeration District: 226; Image: 269.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Ancestry.com. U.S., School Catalogs, 1765-1935. (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2012;)
    Education.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Perrine, Howland Delano. Daniel Perrin "The Huguenot" and his descendants in America of the surnames Perrine, Perine and Prine, 1665-1910. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1945)
    birth.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 United States. 1870 U.S. Census Population Schedule. (National Archives Microfilm Publications M593 and T132)
    Year: 1870; Census Place: Rochester Ward 2, Monroe, New York; Roll: M593_969; Page: 57B; Image: 116; Family History Library Film: 552468.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Florida, United States. Death Index, 1877-1998.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 New York, United States. 1915 New York State Census
    New York State Archives; Albany, New York; State Population Census Schedules, 1915; Election District: 02; Assembly District: 05; City: Rochester Ward 11; County: Monroe; Page: 20.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 United States. 1910 U.S. Census Population Schedule. (National Archives Microfilm Publication T624)
    Year: 1910; Census Place: Rochester Ward 11, Monroe, New York; Roll: T624_991; Page: 6B; Enumeration District: 0110; FHL microfilm: 1375004.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 United States. 1900 U.S. Census Population Schedule. (National Archives Microfilm Publication T623)
    Year: 1900; Census Place: Rochester Ward 11, Monroe, New York; Roll: 1075; Page: 5A; Enumeration District: 0074; FHL microfilm: 1241075.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 U.S. City Directories, 1821-1995: [database on-line]. (Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011).
  12. ↑ Perrine, Howland Delano. Daniel Perrin "The Huguenot" and his descendants in America of the surnames Perrine, Perine and Prine, 1665-1910. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1945)
    Daniel Perrin, "The Huguenot," and his descendants in America : of the surnames, Perrine, Perine, and Prine, 1665-1910 (1910).
  13. ↑ Bellevue Medical College historical index. (Location: http://archives.med.nyu.edu/research/;)
    Graduation information.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Transactions Volume 25, Homeopathy
    page 11.
  15. ↑ Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 76 (Google eBook). (Date: 1893;)
    Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 76 (Google eBook).

    Summary: Charles and Frank were in debt to someone named Bradley Redfield. In mid-February, Charles and Frank took out a loan from Charles' sister, Mary, for which they pledged certain property as security. (A "chattel mortgage" is an old-fashioned term for a secured loan, which is a loan that, if not repaid, allows the lender to take some of the borrower's property and sell it to satisfy the debt.) Mary did not record the mortgage until late March, and, on the same day, she took Charles and Frank's property as payment for the loan and sold the property to recover her loss on the loan. Five days later, Bradley finished the court process necessary to collect his debt against Charles and Frank. However, Charles and Frank did not have enough property to recover and Bradley also attempted to collect from Mary, claiming that the mortgage was void and that therefore Bradley, not Mary, was entitled to the proceeds from Mary's sale of Charles and Frank's property. The Court said that, while an unrecorded mortgage is void against a creditor, Bradley's rights as a creditor did not come into being until his court case finalized five days after the mortgage had been recorded and, therefore, the mortgage was valid and Bradley could not recover against Mary. To talk a little bit more about what's going on outside the case, it looks like Bradley tried to claim also that the arrangement among Charles, Frank, and Mary was not a true loan, but the trial court (the court whose decision was being appealed in the case you linked) ruled that there was no fraudulent intent by Charles, Frank, and Mary. It's also worth noting that the case you linked to is an appeal. In the original trial, even though the court there found no fraud, the trial court still voided the mortgage. Charles, Frank, and Mary appealed and the appellate court reversed the lower court's ruling (about the validity of the mortgage, not about the "no fraud" finding) with the decisions you found above.

  16. ↑ Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 76 (Google eBook). (Date: 1893;)
    Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 76 (Google eBook).

    Summary: Charles and Frank were in debt to someone named Bradley Redfield. In mid-February, Charles and Frank took out a loan from Charles' sister, Mary, for which they pledged certain property as security. (A "chattel mortgage" is an old-fashioned term for a secured loan, which is a loan that, if not repaid, allows the lender to take some of the borrower's property and sell it to satisfy the debt.)
    Mary did not record the mortgage until late March, and, on the same day, she took Charles and Frank's property as payment for the loan and sold the property to recover her loss on the loan.
    Five days later, Bradley finished the court process necessary to collect his debt against Charles and Frank. However, Charles and Frank did not have enough property to recover and Bradley also attempted to collect from Mary, claiming that the mortgage was void and that therefore Bradley, not Mary, was entitled to the proceeds from Mary's sale of Charles and Frank's property.
    The Court said that, while an unrecorded mortgage is void against a creditor, Bradley's rights as a creditor did not come into being until his court case finalized five days after the mortgage had been recorded and, therefore, the mortgage was valid and Bradley could not recover against Mary.
    To talk a little bit more about what's going on outside the case, it looks like Bradley tried to claim also that the arrangement among Charles, Frank, and Mary was not a true loan, but the trial court (the court whose decision was being appealed in the case you linked) ruled that there was no fraudulent intent by Charles, Frank, and Mary.
    It's also worth noting that the case you linked to is an appeal. In the original trial, even though the court there found no fraud, the trial court still voided the mortgage. Charles, Frank, and Mary appealed and the appellate court reversed the lower court's ruling (about the validity of the mortgage, not about the "no fraud" finding) with the decisions you found above.

Retrieved from "https://www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Charles_Perrine_%282%29"