Person talk:Richard Child (2)

1691 versus 1694 [5 March 2015]

The Bond excerpt shows it was the son that d. 1691, I cited that because I was mislead by previous data on page. However, the source I cited on the page number indicated exactly what I said it did and it wasn't typed wrong. Rather it needed to be changed to reflect a different record on a different page to show the death of the correct Richard Child. --Jrich 06:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

I initiated the original error. Then transferred to the son. No harm done. Just piecing together info, then found the source, when I was tired of typing for a while. --SkippyG 07:39, 5 March 2015 (UTC)