ViewsWatchers |
[add comment] [edit] Two people? [23 January 2010]This page has some appearances of being two people combined into one page. One John Kendall d. 1660 in Cambridge England. One John Kendall m. abt. 1644 Elizabeth, widow of Samuel Holley in Cambridge Massachusetts. John and Elizabeth sold land in Cambridge about 1646 Massachusetts. This appears to be a different Elizabeth than Elizabeth Scherell who is listed as dying 1640. The website cited here lists the death of John Kendall in 1660 in Massachusetts, but the source it cites lists the death as 1660 in England. More sources would help. --Jrich 09:42, 19 January 2010 (EST) Perhaps Clemens erred placing his death in England. The dates seem to agree. Also he offers no source citation indicating he was the father of Thomas and Franccis.--Scot 13:26, 19 January 2010 (EST) If John Kendall the elder came to New England, it does not seem like Francis would qualify as the immigrant ancestor he is given credit for. To me, this indicates the father did die in England, and so the person in Cambridge, Mass. is probably not the father of Francis and Thomas Kendall.
[add comment] [edit] Source: Dawes-Gates Ancestral Lines [23 January 2010]Source:Ferris, Mary Walton. Dawes-Gates Ancestral Lines, p. 370, 371, and 375:
I believe the relationship of Francis and Thomas is pretty solid based on identification in one or the other's will. Don't happen to have the reference handy. (Jillaine added it below.)((Thank you.)) However, the identification of Francis as a brother of Mabel was somewhat ambiguous as I recall, being verbal, and could have indicated a church member rather than a family member. Given a shared surname, it seems likely they are brother and sister, but this is hardly conclusive. ((See John Harrington Stevens source added below.)) I do not know of any evidence connecting any of them to John of Cambridge other than shared surname. If he is a brother of Francis, then the father could have died in Cambridge, England while the son died in Cambridge, Massachusetts and this page is a combination of the two.
I do not know how the father of Francis and Thomas is known to be John Kendall of England. Source:Laughlin, Kendall. Descendants of William Kendall of Ashford, Connecticut and Caledonia County, Vermont; a Genealogy, p. 3, says "it may be noted that records in England show that the names of the parents of John Kendall (1580-1660), Francis's father, were John Kendall and Mary Miles". But no such records are given. The uncertainty would suggest knowledge of these records is not, in fact, widespread. I have seen Francis's origins placed in County Kent, County Norfolk, and of course, County Middlesex. --Jrich 17:35, 19 January 2010 (EST) [add comment] [edit] Source: The Kendall Family in America [23 January 2010]Ancestry.com. The Kendall family in America [database on-line]. Provo, UT: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004. Original data: Clemens, William Montgomery,. The Kendall family in America. Hackensack, N.J.: W.M. Clemens, 1990. Chapter: Kendalls in England... page 4: "The ancestor of the American Kendall family was John Kendall who was born in 1608 and died in County Cambridge in 1660. Two of his sons, Francis and Thomas, came to New England before 1640. Argh... I'm falling asleep... more later. Jillaine 01:41, 23 January 2010 (EST)
Let me suggest the reason Francis is known as the progenitor is due to the fact that Thomas left no sons. Clemens says he had 10 daus. and proceeds to list 9 daus, one of whom dy as well as a son who also dy. The naming pattern suggests Thomas parents were indeed John and Elizabeth. I find on line that his wife was Rebecca Paine b 17 Jul, 1618 to Anthony and Alice (Potter) Paine. I have not yet checked the following: SOURCE NOTES for Thomas: Gen. Hist. of Town of Reading,MA (Hon. Lilley Eaton); Hist. of Western NY (Cutter) 3:1071-1072; MARRIAGE: New England Marriages: Prior to 1700 (C. A. Torrey) p. 433 SOURCE NOTES for Rebecca: Gen. Hist. of Town of Reading,MA (Hon. Lilley Eaton) p.93--Scot 15:01, 23 January 2010 (EST) [add comment] [edit] Source: Gen. History of the Town of Reading, MA
[add comment] [edit] Source: New England Marriages Prior to 1700p 432-433:
[add comment] [edit] Source: Vital Records of Reading, MA to 1850(These should be moved over to Thomas' page once we've looked at them. Jillaine 15:55, 23 January 2010 (EST)) page 136... Births: Kendall:
Marriages (pp 377-278) Kendall (early ones only)
Deaths (p 534) - Kendall
[add comment] [edit] Source: Pope's Pioneers of Massachusetts [23 January 2010]Page 266: Kendall... John, Cambridge, 1644-6. He m. about 1644, Elizabeth, widow of Samuel Holly, and sold the H. estate with her in 1646. Note: Pope (same page) mentions Francis of Woburn as well as Thomas of Reading saying they were brothers. He does not say this about John. [add comment] [edit] Source: Founders of Early American FamiliesPage 183: Mentions only Francis. [add comment] [edit] Source: Genealogies and Estates of CharlestownPage 569: Kendall. Mentions a number of Kendalls, including Francis of Woburn, but neither John nor Thomas.--Jillaine 15:36, 23 January 2010 (EST) [add comment] [edit] Source (sic): Kendall web page [23 January 2010]This web page (scroll down to Generation #7) claims (without source) that John Kendall was born 1608; d. 1664 in England; m. Elizabeth Satcherell, and that he was son of John Kendall and another Elizabeth Satcherell, and was brother to Thomas and Francis. But this same page also claims that their father John Kendall (b 1580; m. 25 Nov 1606 Elizabeth Satcherell) was he who died in Cambridge, *MA* 1659/60. And that his wife died in Cambridge, MA in 1640. Harumph. Jillaine 16:17, 23 January 2010 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Source: Vital Records of Cambridge, to the year 1850 [23 January 2010]Page 406 (Births) nothing earlier than 1776; mostly mid 1800s Page 2_225-226 (Marriages; early ones only):
Page 2_625 (Deaths): Nothing before 1803.
[add comment] [edit] Source: History of Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1630-1877 (Volume 1)page 595: Kendall, John, sold land on the south side of the river 8 Sept. 1646; according to the Record, “Edward jackson bought of John Kendall and Elizabeth his wife, one dwelling-house, late Samuel Hollyes, together with an out-house and ten acres of land.” His w. Elizabeth was widow of Samuel Holley; she may have suffered death for supported witchcraft. See page 355. 2. (implying son of John?) Thomas, by w. Sarah, had Mary, b 28 Ap. 1711.--Jillaine 16:31, 23 January 2010 (EST) [add comment] [edit] Source: Will of Francis Kendall [24 January 2010]Near its end, it makes reference to his brother Thomas. No such reference is made to any other brother.
apiece to be paid by my executors. In case any of the eight children die, the eldest child of the deceased shall enjoy the mother’s gift. I do this in rememberance of the kindness I had for my loving brother. Found here. (PDF) (Lacking source citation, however.) Jillaine 16:49, 23 January 2010 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Source: Ancestry of Colonel John Harrington Stevens [24 January 2010]Only partially viewable on Google, but it say that Mabel's deposition on her second husband's estate mentioning "brother Francis Kendall" could be explained by her son marrying his daughter. Would like to find more of the document, but if no "my" in front of brother, it could also be religious. Mabel "is further said" to be d/o Henry Kendall and Gabriel[la?] Armstrong. --Jrich 17:07, 23 January 2010 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Source: History and Genealogy: Kendalls, Cunninghams, Snodgrasses [23 January 2010]Kendall, Norman Festus,. History and genealogy, Kendalls, Cunninghams, Snodgrasses : illustrated. Grafton, W. Va.: Grafton Sentinel Pub. Co., 1942. (found on ancestry.com) This appears to be the source for Thomas and Francis being brothers or sons to John of Cambridge, but it has conflicting data-- or rather, different people have interpreted it differently; my notes are in brackets below. Research was conducted in the late 1930s, early 1940s, in England. The researchers in England were, according to this publication, unable to complete their research due to the bombings. So they sent their notes and report draft of what they'd compiled to date. What's driving me bonkers is they do not say what church these records were found in! Jillaine 17:29, 23 January 2010 (EST) History and Genealogy: Kendalls, Cunninghams, Snodgrasses Page 5 Unfinished Kendall Genealogy Memorandum--Notes [male lines only; bold is line of secent]:
The rest of the source focuses on southern Kendalls, not those of New England.--Jillaine 17:23, 23 January 2010 (EST) It doesn't seem like that the John or Thomas could be sons of John Kendall and Mary Miles as this would make his father somewhere around 68 when Francis was born about 1620 (deposed, two different occasions). Also his name wasn't Francis, alias Miles, Kendall, it was Francis Kendall alias Miles, so suggesting he was the son named Miles seems a misreading. Thus Francis and Thomas would appear to be the sons of the last John, and the notation "New England" next to John, s/o John Kendall and Mary Miles, would appear to suggest John of Cambridge is their father. But, as you say, this is basically still unsubstantiated without knowing where this all came from. --Jrich 17:44, 23 January 2010 (EST) |