Person:Thomas Rood (5)

Browse
Thomas Rood
b.Bef 1624
  • HThomas RoodBef 1624 - 1672
  • WSarah _____Bef 1629 - 1668
m. Bef 1649
  1. Sarah Rood1649 -
  2. Thomas Rood1651 - Bef 1718/19
  3. Micah Rood1653 -
  4. Rachel Rood1655 -
  5. John Rood1658 -
  6. Joseph Rood1661 -
  7. Benjamin Rood1663 -
  8. Mary Rood1664 - 1664
  9. Samuel Rood1666 -
Facts and Events
Name[1][2] Thomas Rood
Gender Male
Birth[1] Bef 1624 Based on estimated date of marriage.
Marriage Bef 1649 Estimate based on date of birth of eldest known child (Sarah).
to Sarah _____
Death[1][2] 18 Oct 1672 Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut, United States (probably)
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Thomas Rood, in Savage, James. A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England: Showing Three Generations of Those Who Came Before May, 1692, on the Basis of Farmer's Register. (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1860-1862)
    3:572.

    "Rood, Thomas, Norwich, had sev. childr. bef. liv. there; Sarah , b. Oct. 1649; Thomas, Mar. 1651; Micah, Feb. 1653; Rachel, Feb. 1655; John, Sept. 1658; Joseph, Mar. 1661; Benjamin, Feb. 1633; Mary, Mar. 1664, d. soon; and Samuel, June 1666. His w. d. happi. Mar. 1668, for his d. Sarah was whip. and he execut. 18 Oct. 1672, as in Trumbull. Col. rec. II. 184, is detail."

  2. 2.0 2.1 Connecticut. Colonial General Assembly; Charles J. (Charles Jeremy) Hoadly; Connecticut. Colonial Council; Connecticut. Colonial Council of Safety; J. Hammond (James Hammond) Trumbull; and United Colonies of New England. Commmissioners. The public records of the colony of Connecticut, 1636-1776. (Hartford [Connecticut]: Case, Lockwood & Brainard, 1850-1890)
    2:184.

    "Thomas and Sarah Rood were tried at the Court of Assistants at Hartford, October 8th, 1672, on a charge of incest. Both plead guilty to the indictment. Thomas Rood was sentenced to be executed on the 18th inst; his daughter, to be severely whipt, 'that others may heare an feare.' The Colony Laws made no special provision for the punishment of incest; and this appears to have been the first instance of a prosecution for that crime, within the Colony. The Court of Assistant! in June, 1672, submitted to several of the neighboring ministers, the query whether a person guilty of the crime charged against the prisoner ought to he put to death? The reply, signed by Rev. Messrs. Whiting, Bulkeley, Haynes and Collins, was in the affirmative; and doubtless served to remove any scruples the Court may have previously entertained. [Rec. of Court of Assist's, I. 11-13, 15; Ecclesiastical Papers, I. 39.]"