Person:Susannah Gorton (1)

Susannah Gorton
b.Bet 1649 and 1650 Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island
m. Bef 11 Jan 1629/30
  1. Samuel Gorton1629/30 - 1724
  2. Maher Gorton1638 -
  3. John Gorton1640 - 1713/14
  4. Mary Gorton1641 - Bet 1687 & 1688
  5. Sarah Gorton1644 -
  6. Ann Gorton1645 - 1750
  7. Elizabeth GortonBet 1647 & 1648 - Aft 1704
  8. Susannah GortonBet 1649 & 1650 - 1734
  9. Benjamin Gorton1650 - 1699
m. 18 Jun 1672
  1. Rufus Barton1673 - Bef 1752
  2. Rev. Andrew Barton1675 - 1723
  3. Phebe Barton
  4. Mary Barton1678 - 1712/13
  5. Naomi Barton1686 - 1727
Facts and Events
Name Susannah Gorton
Gender Female
Birth? Bet 1649 and 1650 Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island
Marriage 18 Jun 1672 Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United Statesto Benjamin Barton
Will[1] 7 May 1721 (1727?)
Death? 28 May 1734 Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts
References
  1. Abstracts of Warwick Wills, in Alden G. Beaman. Rhode Island Genealogical Register. (The Rhode Island Genealogical Research Institute)
    3:284.

    Susanna Barton, widow of Benjamin Barton of Warwick. Will dated 7 May *1721; proved 27 Jul 1734, pps. 365-6.
    Sons: Rufus Barton, and Andrew Barton, deceased.
    Daughters: Mary Green, deceased, Neomi Carr late of Jamestown, deceased, who married (1) Ebenezer Slocum, deceased and (2) Edward Carr; and Phebe Tucker, wife of Henry Tucker.
    Granddaughter Susanna Chelsey, wife of William Chelsey.
    6 unnamed grandsons, sons of daughter Mary Greene, deceased.
    Grandson Benjamin Barton, son of Andrew Barton deceased.
    Granddaughter Susanna Barton daughter of Andrew Barton deceased.
    3 grandchildren being the children of daughter Neomi Carr late of Jamestown deceased, namely Ruth Slocum, Edward Carr and Benjamin Carr all under age.
    To my granddaughter Ruth Slocum daughter of my daughter Neomi Carr deceased £50 when age 18 or married, she already having a legacy of £100 from her father Ebenezer Slocum deceased and her father-in-law {step father} Edward Carr ...
    Rufus Barton son of son Rufus Barton.

    *Note: 1721 doesn't make sense as some of the named grandchildren were born in 1723-1726.