Person:Sarah Wormell (1)

Browse
Sarah Wormell
b.Abt 1684
 
m. Abt 1665
  1. Josiah WormallAbt 1670 - Bef 1738
  2. John WormallEst 1672 - Abt 1711/12
  3. Hannah WormallEst 1674 - 1758
  4. Mary WormallEst 1676 - 1703
  5. Lydia WormallEst 1678 -
  6. Hester WormallEst 1680 -
  7. Sarah WormellAbt 1684 -
  8. Phebe WormallEst 1685 -
m. 8 Jan 1706/07
  1. Alice Allen1707 -
  2. Sarah Allen1710 - 1744
  3. Martha Allen1713 -
  4. Nehemiah Allen1715 -
  5. Bethia AllenBef 1718 -
  6. Lydia AllenAbt 1721 - 1800
Facts and Events
Name[2] Sarah Wormell
Gender Female
Birth[1] Abt 1684 based on marriage date
Marriage 8 Jan 1706/07 Bridgewater, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United Statesto Nehemiah Allen
References
  1. Mitchell, Nahum. History of the Early Settlement of Bridgewater, in Plymouth County, Massachusetts: including an extensive family register. (Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States: Printed for the author by Kidder & Wright, 1840 (reprinted 1897))
    93.

    Nehemiah (s. of Samuel 1) m. Sarah Wormel 1707, and had Alice 1707, Sarah 1710, Martha 1713, Nehemiah 1715, Bethiah. Lydia. Alice m. Arthur Latham 1733, and then Jonathan Allen, of Braintree, 1739.—Sarah m. Nath'l Pratt, of Bridgewater, 1734.—Martha m. Dea. Jacob Hayward 1736. Bethiah m. Micah Turner of Weymouth.—Lydia m. Richard Vining of Weymouth.—Jonathan Allen, of Braintree, m. Mary, D. of Capt. Chilton Latham, 1742, and had several Ds. m. here; 2 m. Ramsdells, and one m. Seth Hobart.

  2. Russell, Donna Valley and Alicia Crane Williams. "Descendants of Joseph Wormall of Scituate", in Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants. Mayflower Descendant: An Illustrated Quarterly Magazine of Pilgrim Genealogy, History and Biography
    Vol. 43, p. 155.

    Children of Josiah Wormall and Remember Browne: Sarah, m. 8 Jan 1706/7 Nehemiah Allen.
    [Note: the authors are respectable, but no evidence of Sarah's parentage (and some of the other assertions) is given. E.g., the father Josiah is said to have died "intestate in Duxbury after 1685", but no administration is referenced, and a later comment says he was on a grand jury in 1690 so the assertion seems, at a minimum imprecise, almost misleading?]