Person:Sarah Bangs (3)

Browse
Sarah Bangs
d.2 Apr 1759
m. 16 Jul 1664
  1. Edward Bangs1665 - 1745/46
  2. Rebecca Bangs1666/67 -
  3. Jonathan Bangs1670 - 1670
  4. Mary Bangs1671 - Bef 1745
  5. Jonathan Bangs1673 - Bef 1737/38
  6. Hannah Bangs1675/76 -
  7. Thomasine Bangs1678 -
  8. Samuel Bangs1680 - 1750
  9. Mercy Bangs1682 - 1747
  10. Elizabeth Bangs1685 -
  11. Sarah Bangs1687 - 1759
  12. Lydia Bangs1689 - 1715
m. 8 Jan 1707
  1. Ruth Collins1708 - 1756
  2. Richard Collins1709/10 - 1768
  3. Lydia Collins1712 -
  4. Benjamin Collins1713 -
  5. Jonathan Collins1715 -
  6. Sarah CollinsAbt 1718 -
  7. Hannah Collins1720 - Bef 1747
  8. Mary Collins1722 -
  9. Joseph Collins1723/24 -
  10. Silvanus CollinsAbt 1727 -
Facts and Events
Name Sarah Bangs
Gender Female
Birth[1][2][3][4][5] 2 Aug 1687 Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 8 Jan 1707 Truro, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United Statesto Benjamin Collins
Death[2] 2 Apr 1759
References
  1. Vital Records of Eastham and Orleans, in Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants. Mayflower Descendant: An Illustrated Quarterly Magazine of Pilgrim Genealogy, History and Biography
    4:30.

    Sarah Banges the daughter of Jonnathan Banges was born in Agust in the year. 1689 :

  2. 2.0 2.1 Joseph Collins of Eastham, in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    151:14.

    Claims death in 73rd year, which would calculate to birth in 1687.

  3. Hamblin, David, First Settlers of Eastham, Mass., in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    6:43.

    Sarah, b. Aug ---, 1689 (probably 1687). [comment in original]

  4. Not sure where the specific birth date 2 Aug 1687 comes from, it is not in the transcription of the vital records cited. Only the month and year are given.
  5. Note that most sources assign a birth date in 1687, probably calculated from the age at death, while the transcription of the vital records gives 1689. The preference for 1687 is probably motivated by the same vital records giving a birth of 2 Oct 1689 to sister Lydia, which is clearly not consistent with Sarah being born in Aug. 1689.