Menu
Home
Search
▼
All
People
Families
Articles
Images
Places
Sources
List
▼
People
Contributions
Add
▼
Person
Family
Article
Image
Place
MySource
Source
Transcript
Repository
User Page
Other Page
Import GEDCOM
My Relate
▼
Dashboard
Network
Watchlist
User Profile
Talk Page
My Trees
Show duplicates
Data Quality Issues
Admin
▼
Recent changes
Nominate
Logs
New Images
Review needed
Gedcom review
Speedy Delete
Names Log
Browse Pages
Compare pages
Special Pages
Personal tools
Sign in
Create account
Donate
Volunteer
Help
▼
Contents
Search
FAQ
Support
Portals
Watercooler
Suggestions
Person:Martha Thayer (5)
View the talk page
Views
Person
Talk
Edit
History
What links here
more
▼
Print
Watchers
Jrich
Browse
Thayer
in
Douglas
Martha Thayer
b.
6 Jun 1763
Douglas, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Family tree
▼
Parents and Siblings
(
edit
)
F
.
Joseph Thayer
Abt 1715 -
M
.
Sarah Balcom
- 1762
m.
Aft 24 Feb 1740/41
Tirzah Thayer
1741 -
Sarah Thayer
Abt 1748 - 1753
Mary Thayer
1749 -
Phebe Thayer
1751 -
John Thayer
1752 -
Thaddeus Thayer
1755 -
Sarah Thayer
1757 -
Martha Thayer
1763 -
Add Spouse and Children
Facts and Events
Name
Martha Thayer
Gender
Female
Birth
[1]
[3]
6 Jun 1763
Douglas, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
↑
Douglas, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States.
Vital Records of Douglas, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849
. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1906)
p. 61.
THARE, Martha, d. Joseph and Sarah, [born] June 6, 1763.
Thayer, Bezaleel.
Memorial of the Thayer name, from the Massachusetts colony of Weymouth and Braintree, embracing genealogical and biographical sketches of Richard and Thomas Thayer, and their descendants, from 1636 to 1874
. (Oswego, N.Y.: R.J. Oliphant, 1874).
↑
Either this date, or the recorded death of the mother in 1762, is off by a year.
Source:Thayer, Bezaleel. Memorial of the Thayer Name, from the Massachusetts Colony of Weymouth and Braintree, Embracing Genealogical and Biographical
, p. 467, gives this date as 1 Jun 1762, but given the frequent unexplained discrepancy between this source and records, and even the discrpancy here of 1 Jun versus 6 Jun, it is unknown if this source can be afforded any weight.
Don't want ads?