[Note: this source shows two sons named John, one born 1650 per town records, one born about 1657 justified by a cryptic comment "aged 22 in 1679". As no basis has yet been found (such as a deposition), excepting deeds in 1679 which indicate he was at least 21, it is unknown if this age has a basis or it is merely derived from an assumption of the author. At the same time, no event has been located that requires he be born earlier than 1657. There is no age on his death record, surprising with either birth date, as one would be about 99, the other about 106, and it is the implied age at death that suggests that the 1650 date may not have been the man who lived.]
