|
- H. Rev. Joel Foster1755 - 1812
- W. Mary Wyman (add)
m. Aft 10 Sep 1803
Facts and Events
References
- ↑ "Stafford Vital Records" [NEHGS], in Connecticut, United States. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records
p. 60.
FOSTER, Joel, s. Nathan & Betsey, b. Apr. 8, 175[blank] [2:5] [Note: see note explaining justification for 1755 as likely case.]
- ↑ Pierce, Frederick Clifton. Foster Genealogy: Being a Record of the Posterity of Reginald Foster, an Early Inhabitant of Ipswich in New England, Whose Genealogy is Traced Back to Anacher, Great Forrester of Flanders, Who Died in 837 A.D., with Wills, Inventories, Biographical Sketches, Etc.; Also the Record of all Other American Fosters. (Chicago: The Author, 1899)
p. 165, 237.
Children of Nathan Foster [#257] and Elizabeth Lansford: Joel, b. 8 Apr 1755, m. Priscilla Foster and Mrs. Mary Winship.
- ↑ Records of births, marriages, deaths, freemen and electors, Stafford, Connecticut: taken from land records vol. 1 and 2, and from vol. A. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1983)
p. 39.
[Cites Vol. A, p. 6] Joel Foster Son of Nathan and Betsy Foster was Born April 8th 1754. [Note: see note explaining justification for 1755 as likely case.]
- ↑ Wayland, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Wayland, Massachusetts, to the year 1850. (Boston, Mass: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1910)
p. 138.
FOSTER, Joel, Rev., [died] Sept. 25, 1812. [gravel gout, a. 58, CR1] [Sept. 24, in 58th y. "& 33d of his Ministry", GR1]
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Find A Grave: North Cemetery, Wayland, MA, in Find A Grave
Rev Joel Foster.
SACRED To the memory of the REV. JOEL FOSTER who died September 24, 1812, In the 58th year of his Age & 33d of his ministry.
- ↑ The basis for the birthdate in the Foster Genealogy is unknown: it could be based on his interpretation of a hard-to-read record, or it could be unknowable and the date might represent Pierce's guess. Page 237 say the birth occurred in Warren, Mass., which seems unlikely and there is not record there.
The record saying 1754 is discounted because his birth would be slightly less than 9 months after Nathan. It is presumed this is a guess about a hard-to-read record. 1755 seems the most likely due to spacing of sibling births. He died 1812 in 58th year, so age 57, and born about 1755.
|
|