Person:James Lovett (2)

m. Bet 1644 and 1645
  1. James Lovett1648 - 1718
  2. Mary Lovett1651 - 1732
  3. Martha Lovett1654 - 1749/50
  4. Hannah Lovett1656 - 1715
m. 20 Jan 1668/69
  1. Hannah Lovett1669 - 1669
  2. John LovetEst 1671 -
  3. Mary LovettEst 1673 - 1758
  4. Martha LovetEst 1675 -
  5. Joanna LovettEst 1677 -
  6. Daniel Lovett1680 - 1748
  7. Sarah Lovett1682 - 1685
  8. Abigail Lovett1685 - 1717
  9. Sarah Lovett1687/88 -
  10. James Lovett1693 - 1693/94
Facts and Events
Name James Lovett
Gender Male
Birth[1][2][3] 5 Oct 1648 Braintree, Norfolk County, Massachusetts, USA
Marriage 20 Jan 1668/69 Mendon, Worcester County, Massachusetts, USAto Hannah Tyler
Death[4] 27 Mar 1718 Mendon, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
Ancestral File Number BSS6-Q3
References
  1. Brigham, Willard Irving Tyler, and Calvin Cedric Tyler. The Tyler Genealogy: The Descendants of Job Tyler of Andover, Massachusetts, 1619-1700. (Plainfield, New Jersey and Tylerville, Connecticut (Vols. 1 & 2); Grand Rapids, Michigan (Vol. 3): Cornelius B. Tyler and Rollin U. Tyler (Vols. 1 & 2); Calvin Cedric Tyler (Vol. 3), 1912, 1976)
    1:32.

    'HANNAH TYLER ([daughter of] JOB), married, January 20, 1668. Lieut. James Lovett, born July 8, 1648, son of Daniel Lovett.'

  2. Savage, James. A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England: Showing Three Generations of Those Who Came Before May, 1692, on the Basis of Farmer's Register. (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1860-1862)
    3:124.

    'Lovett, ... Daniel, Braintree 1662, ... but at B. had, prob. all his ch. James, b. 8 July 1648; ...'

  3. Bates, Samuel. Records of the Town of Braintree, 1640 to 1793. (Randolph, Massachusetts : D.H. Huxford, 1886)
    page 631.

    'James Lovitt, the sonne of Daniel Lovitt and Johanna his wiffe was borne the 5th mo. 8th 1648.'

    With two exceptions, the records for the earliest years (1643-1655) are written as day, month, year (e.g., '(16) (5th) 1646'), or are ambiguous (e.g, '5, mo. 7'). Although it would seem natural to associate 'mo.' with the first number in a format such as '5th mo. 8th', there is at least one record (on page 635) in which it is clearly associated with the second number: '(15)th. mo. (8th.) 1653'. Therefore, I have chosen to interpret all the early ambiguous dates as day, month, year, even though Savage did not always do so.

  4. Mendon, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Mendon, Massachusetts to the Year 1850. (Boston, MA: Wright & Potter, 1920)
    page 480, Deaths.

    'LOVET ...
    James, Mar. 27, 1718.'