Person:James Keyes (13)

Watchers
Browse
m. 11 Sep 1665
  1. Elias Keyes1666 -
  2. James Keyes1670 - 1746
  3. Sarah Keyes1673 -
  4. Thomas Keyes1674/75 - 1742
m. Bef 1694
  1. Elias Keyes1694 -
  2. James Keyes1696 -
  3. Jonathan Keyes1698 -
  4. Matthias Keyes1698 -
  5. Elizabeth Keyes1701 - Bef 1748
  6. William Keyes1702/03 -
  7. Hannah Keyes1703/04 -
  8. Prudence KeyesAbt 1706 - 1739/40
Facts and Events
Name[3] James Keyes
Gender Male
Birth[1] 13 Sep 1670 Sudbury, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage Bef 1694 probably Marlborough, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United StatesBased on birth of eldest known child
to Hannah _____
Death[2] 25 Sep 1746 Bolton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Sudbury, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Sudbury, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1903)
    p. 82.

    KEAYES, James, s. Elijah and Sarah, [born] Sept. 13, 1670. MR

  2. Bolton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Bolton, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849. (Worcester, Mass.: Franklin P. Rice, 1910)
    p. 211.

    KEYES, James, [died] Sept. 25 [29?], 1746, in 77th y. [76 y. 16 d., GS3]
    [Note: the original clearly says 25, so one would guess the only reason for questioning if the date should be 29 is because the compilers want the age at death to match the above birthdate, which happens if the date of death is 29 Sep 1746.]

  3. Hudson, Charles. History of the town of Marlborough, Middlesex County, Massachusetts: from its first settlement in 1657 to 1861 : with a brief sketch of the town of Northborough, a genealogy of the families in Marlborough to 1800, and an account of the celebration of the two hundredth anniversary of the incorporation of the town. (Boston: Press of T.R. Marvin & Son, 1862)
    p. 409.

    "James Keyes was one of the proprietors of the Indian plantation in 1693. He may have been in the town some years before that time. He was probably a descendant of Robert Keyes, of Watertown, as will be seen below."
    [Note: what is "shown below" is that James is a son of Elias who is a son of Robert, but no justification is given. The justification appears to be naming his first son Elias, since Hudson does not report any death date, and thus did not have the matching age at death which is very convincing.]