Person:Huldah Taylor (2)

Watchers
m. 5 Jul 1721
  1. Nathan Taylor1721/22 - 1746
  2. David Taylor1723 - 1795
  3. Micah Taylor1726 - 1735
  4. Tabitha Taylor1728 -
  5. Judith Taylor1729/30 -
  6. Hannah Taylor1731 - 1756
  7. Huldah Taylor1733 - 1808
  8. Submit Taylor1735 -
  9. Zillah Taylor1737/38 -
  10. Rufus Taylor1740 - 1783
  11. Elizabeth Taylor1742 -
m. 29 Apr 1755
  1. Eleazer Drury1756 -
  2. Hannah DruryAbt 1758 - 1844
  3. Grace Drury1758 -
  4. Elizabeth Drury1762 -
  5. Esther Drury1765 -
  6. Huldah Drury1767 -
  7. Submit Drury1769 -
  8. Thankful Drury1771 - 1791
  9. Thomas Drury1774 -
  10. Joel Drury1777 - 1838
Facts and Events
Name[3] Huldah Taylor
Gender Female
Birth[1] 8 Sep 1733 Shrewsbury, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 29 Apr 1755 Shrewsbury, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Thomas Drury
Death[2] 14 Mar 1808 Phillipston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Shrewsbury, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1904)
    101.

    TAYLOR, Huldah, d. Eleazer and Judeth, [born] Sept. 8, 1733.

  2. Phillipston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Phillipston, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1906)
    p. 103.

    DRURY, Wid. Huldah, [died] March 14, 1808, a. 78. CR
    [Birth about 1730.]

  3. Ward, Andrew Henshaw. History of the town of Shrewsbury, Massachusetts: from its settlement in 1717 to 1829, with other matter relating thereto not before published, including an extensive family register. (Boston, Massachusetts: Samuel G. Drake, 1847)
    p. 266.

    Thomas Drury, m. 29 Apr 1755 Huldah, d/o Eleazer Taylor, and removed to Narraganset, No. 6, now Templeton.
    [Note: Ward misidentifies which Thomas Drury it was that married Huldah, but he only says "probably". Barry's History of Framingham which says it was the son of John and Susannah, plus the age of Huldah, plus the marriage of the Thomas that Ward was referring to in 1746 (as the only Thomas old enough to marry at that time), all suggest Ward is wrong.]