Person:Hannah Guile (1)

m. 1 Sep 1647
  1. Samuel Guile1648 - 1675
  2. Judith Guile1650 - 1672
  3. John Guile1652 - Bef 1726
  4. Hannah Guile1654/55 - 1683
  5. Sarah Guile1657/58 -
  6. James Guile1660 - 1705
  7. Ephraim Guile1661/62 -
m. 10 Mar 1679/80
  1. Samuel Clough1680 - 1728
  2. Thomas Clough1681 - 1749
Facts and Events
Name[1] Hannah Guile
Alt Name[3] Hannah Gild
Gender Female
Alt Birth[3] 12 Feb 1654/55 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Birth[1][3] 25 Feb 1654/55 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 10 Mar 1679/80 Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Thomas Clough
Death[2][4] 22 Dec 1683 Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Alt Death[2][4] 22 Jan 1683/84 Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1 Samuel1 Guile, in Hoyt, David W. The Old Families of Salisbury and Amesbury, Massachusetts. (Providence, RI, 1897-1919)
    1:189.

    "5 Hannah (Guile),2 b. Feb. 25, 1654-5[Hv]; m. March 10, 1680[S], Thomas2 Clough."

  2. 2.0 2.1 6 Thomas2 Clough, in Hoyt, David W. The Old Families of Salisbury and Amesbury, Massachusetts. (Providence, RI, 1897-1919)
    1:100.

    "… Hannah2 Gile (Samuel1, who d. Dec. 22 [or Jan. 22], 1683[S]."

  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Haverhill, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Mass.: Topsfield Historical Society, 1910)
    1:138.

    "Gild, Hannah, d. Samuel and Judith (Davis), [born] Feb. 12 [25. (duplicate entry.)], 1654[-5]."

  4. 4.0 4.1 Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Salisbury, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Massachusetts: Topsfield Historical Society, 1915)
    540.

    "Clough, Hanna, w. Thomas, [died] Jan. 22, 1683. [22 : 10 m. (duplicate entry.)]"
    [The date of the original record would be 22 Jan 1683/84. The date in the duplicate record is 22 Dec 1683 since in 1683 the 10th month was December. The explanation for the discrepancy is unknown.] [It should be noted that this situation, while not common, is not unknown in the published vital records for the various Massachusetts towns.]