Person:George Delvee (3)

Watchers
Browse
George William Delvee
b.25 May 1858 Iowa, United States
m. Aft 23 Apr 1840
  1. Lucy Francis Delvee1843 -
  2. Emily Almeda Delvee1846 -
  3. Salina Delvee1851 -
  4. George DelveeAbt 1854 - Bef 1870
  5. George William Delvee1858 - 1923
  6. Frank DelveeAbt 1864 -
  7. Eveline DelveeAbt 1870 -
Facts and Events
Name[6] George William Delvee
Gender Male
Birth[1] 25 May 1858 Iowa, United States
Death[1][2] 21 Apr 1923 Spokane, Spokane, Washington, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 Washington (State). Bureau of Vital Statistics. Washington Death Certificates [Index], 1907–1960. (FamilySearch, 2016)
    [1].

    Place of Death: County: Spokance; City: Spokane (Samaritan House)
    Name: George W. Delvee
    Residence: Samaritan Home
    Length of residence: 3 yrs.
    Sex: Male; Color: White: Condition: Divorced
    Wife: Elizabeth Delvee
    Date of Birth: May 25 1858
    Age:64 y. 10 m. 24 d.
    Occupation: Retired Rancher
    Birthplace: Iowa
    Father: Alvin Delvee
    Birthplace: Main
    Mother: Olie Gay [sic]
    Birthplace: Maine
    Informant: D. A. Delvee / E. 1306 1/2 Olive
    Date of Death: April 19 1923
    Cause: Bulbular Paralysis / Arterio Sclerosis
    Place of Burial: Riverside Park; Date of Burial: April 21, 1923

  2. Find A Grave: Riverside Memorial Park, Spokane, WA, in Find A Grave
    George WilliamDelvee.

    OUR FATHER
    GEORGE W. DELVEE
    1858 - 1923

  3.   Jefferson, Iowa, United States. 1860 U.S. Census Population Schedule
    line 3 or 4.
  4.   Bates, Missouri, United States. 1870 U.S. Census Population Schedule
    line 10.
  5.   Spokane, Washington, United States. 1910 U.S. Census Population Schedule. (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration Publication T624)
    line 9.
  6. George about 1854, and "W. E." about 1858 are listed in the 1860 census, but in the 1870 census, only George about 1858. It is not clear what happened due to lack of records found. Clearly both sons co-existed in 1860. Possibly the names were reversed in the census. Possibly the younger son took the name George upon the death of the older. Whatever happened, we seem to end up with a George b. 1858.