Person:Elizabeth Newton (28)

Watchers
  1. Samuel Newton1759 - 1822
  2. Abigail Newton1761 -
  3. Peter Newton1763 - 1829
  4. Asa Newton1765 - 1805
  5. Elizabeth Newton1767 - 1829
  6. Hannah Newton1770 - 1850
m. 7 Oct 1789
  1. Elizabeth Gates1790 -
  2. Asa Gates1792 -
  3. Hannah Gates1794 - 1836
  4. Mary Gates1795 -
  5. Reuben Gates1798 - 1855
  6. Amiable Gates1802 -
  7. Alvin Gates1804 -
  8. Abigail Gates1806 -
Facts and Events
Name[3] Elizabeth Newton
Gender Female
Birth[1] 28 Sep 1767 Rutland, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 7 Oct 1789 Rutland, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Benjamin Gates
Death[2] 29 May 1829 Templeton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Rutland, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Rutland, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1905)
    p. 72.

    NEWTON, Elizabeth, d. Peter and Hannah, [born] Sept. 28, 1767.

  2. Templeton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Templeton, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: F.P. Rice, 1907)
    p. 186.

    GATES, Elizabeth, [died] May 29, 1829, a. 62. CR
    [Birth about 1767.]

  3. Leonard, Ermina Elizabeth (Newton). Newton Genealogy: Genealogical, biographical, historical, being a record of the descendants of Richard Newton of Sudbury and Marlborough, Massachusetts 1638, with genealogies of families descended from the immigrants Rev. Roger Newton of Milford, Connecticut, Thomas Newton of Fairfield, Connecticut, Matthew Newton of Stonington, Connecticut, Newtons of Virginia, Newtons near Boston. (De Pere, Wisconsin: B. A. Leonard, 1915)
    p. 538.

    Children of Peter Newton and Hannah Child: Elizabeth, b. 28 Sep 1767, d. Templeton 29 May 1829, m. Rutland 7 Oct 1789 Benjamin Gates.
    [Note: the part cited here, focused on Elizabeth, appears true, as long as you ignore Ms. Leonard's mistaken identification of which Benjamin Gates, in which she requires him to marry at age 13 (even younger than that based on the age at death assigned to him). A better identification may be found at NEHGR, p. 121:222-3, and that has been followed.]