Family:Unknown Mirick and Unknown Unknown (1)

In Genealogy of the Merrick--Mirick--Myrick Family of Massachusetts [1902], pp. 94-95, George B. Merrick presents the deductions of Rev. Edward A. Mirick of Dryden, NY regarding the parentage of John Mirick of Charlestown, based on 'family tradition' and 'historical gleanings'. He concludes that is it reasonable to suppose that the father of William, James, John and Thomas Merrick/Mirick of New England was Sion (John) Meyrick of St. Davids, Pembrokeshire, Wales.

The argument used to support what Rev. Mirick admits is 'pure assumption', is not a strong one, invoking the 'similarity of the family (given) names'; the fact that the brothers sailed from Bristol, 'the nearest prominent sea-port to St. Davids'; and the fact that James and John held occupations 'common among the sea-faring population of St. Davids'. Yet the only male names in common between the family of Sion of St. Davids and the New England families are John, William, Thomas and James (the last if you count Sion's great-grandfather), the first 3 of which were the most common male names of the time. The New England families do not include Owen, Roland or Robert, names appearing in the family of Sion of St. Davids.

Furthermore, Rev. Mirick calculates Sion's birth year as approx. 1579 (based on a standard 33-year gap between generations), while on page 7, Merrick presents information from the Visitation of Pembrokeshire of 1591, which shows that Sion of St. Davids had 2 children by 1591. Thus, Sion was born at least a decade before 1579, making it less likely that he would have had a son born as late as 1620 (the immigrant Thomas' approximate birth year).

On the whole, it appears that it would be best to say that the ancestry of the Miricks who arrived in New England in 1636 is unknown. Dawes-Gates (1931) does not give much credence to the ancestry presented by Merrick. Other than that, I am not aware of anything published on the matter since 1902.

Note that I have put all 4 'brothers' into the same family, as suggested by Rev. Edward A. Mirick. There is evidence that James and John were brothers (James administered John's estate), but as far as I know, there is no evidence for or against the others being their brothers. --DataAnalyst 12:26, 28 August 2011 (EDT)