Family:Josiah Howe and Sarah Bigelow (1)

Facts and Events
Marriage[1][2][3][4] 14 Dec 1706 Marlborough, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Children
BirthDeath
1.
 
2.
 
3.
References
  1. Howe, Gilman Bigelow. Genealogy of the Bigelow family of America: from the marriage in 1642 of John Biglo and Mary Warren to the year 1890. (Worcester, Mass.: Charles Hamilton, 1890)
    pp. 26, 27.

    Sarah, b. Oct. 1, 1681; m. Dec. 11, 1706 [sic, probably 14, see note], Josiah Howe of Marlborough, son of Josiah and Mary (Haynes) Howe, and a grandson of John Howe, the first settler of Marlborough, Mass. He was born in Marlborough 1678, and lived in Marlborough, where she died, and he married a second time, Nov. 22, 1713, Mary Marble, and died Sept. 20, 1766, aged 78, having three children by his first wife.

  2. Marlborough, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1908)
    p. 269.

    HOW, Josiah and Sarah Biglo, Dec. [Nov. CR] 14, 1706.

  3. Hudson, Charles. History of the town of Marlborough, Middlesex County, Massachusetts: from its first settlement in 1657 to 1861 : with a brief sketch of the town of Northborough, a genealogy of the families in Marlborough to 1800, and an account of the celebration of the two hundredth anniversary of the incorporation of the town. (Boston: Press of T.R. Marvin & Son, 1862)
    p. 384.

    Josiah Howe m. 14 Jun 1706 Sarah Bigelow.
    [This was apparently copied by Source:Cutter, William Richard. New England Families, Genealogical and Memorial,Vol. 4, p. 1844.]

  4. Unfortunately, at a time when familysearch.org could have added something by providing an independent indexing of the handwritten records, they apparently indexed the published vital records (film 844943), so offer no help to this farce of dates. It is hard to reconcile these dates, but since Hudson predated the published records, we have to assume he looked at some handwritten record. One could surmise he saw the church record that said eleventh month, i.e., Jan, somehow mistranscribed it as June, while the compilers of the VRs misinterpreted it as Nov.? It seems the only reasonable thing to do is to go with the town record of December. The first child was born Dec 1707, so none of these possibilities can be ruled out without more evidence.